• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为普通大众制定特定食物膳食指南的营养标准。

Developing nutrient criteria for food-specific dietary guidelines for the general public.

作者信息

Mullis R M, Snyder M P, Hunt M K

机构信息

Division of Human Development and Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Jun;90(6):847-51.

PMID:2345259
Abstract

Consumers are asking for specific information about which foods and, in particular, which brands of packaged foods to choose when they eat or purchase food. Point-of-purchase nutrition intervention programs that identify specific foods in restaurants and grocery stores are particularly promising community-based strategies for providing that type of information. However, such strategies demand consistent criteria for determining which foods and/or products should be labeled. This article describes the process of developing and validating criteria and the subsequent uses of the criteria in community nutrition intervention programs. Steps in the process include (a) identifying the scientific basis for the criteria, (b) developing food-group-specific nutrient criteria based on a referent meal pattern, (c) developing the eligibility of single servings of specific foods for labeling based on the nutrient criteria of the food group to which the specific food belongs, and (d) validating the criteria by reviewing actual food products in the grocery stores and restaurants. We conclude that the use of criteria provides a consistent standard for evaluating specific foods and food items in nutrition evaluation programs.

摘要

消费者在进食或购买食品时,会询问有关选择哪些食物,尤其是哪些品牌包装食品的具体信息。在餐馆和杂货店中识别特定食品的购买点营养干预计划,是提供此类信息特别有前景的基于社区的策略。然而,此类策略需要确定哪些食品和/或产品应加标签的一致标准。本文描述了制定和验证标准的过程以及这些标准在社区营养干预计划中的后续用途。该过程中的步骤包括:(a) 确定标准的科学依据;(b) 根据参考膳食模式制定特定食物组的营养标准;(c) 根据特定食物所属食物组的营养标准,确定特定食物单份食用量的加标签资格;(d) 通过审查杂货店和餐馆中的实际食品来验证标准。我们得出结论,标准的使用为营养评估计划中评估特定食品和食品项目提供了一致的标准。

相似文献

1
Developing nutrient criteria for food-specific dietary guidelines for the general public.为普通大众制定特定食物膳食指南的营养标准。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Jun;90(6):847-51.
2
Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims for processed foods: 1997 Food Label and Package Survey.加工食品的营养标签、健康声明和营养成分声明状况:1997年食品标签与包装调查
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Sep;100(9):1057-62. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00308-4.
3
[Health and nutrition claims made on food: what future?].[食品上的健康与营养声称:未来何去何从?]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2006 Nov;190(8):1663-80; discussion 1680-2.
4
Sources of data for developing and maintaining a nutrient database.用于开发和维护营养数据库的数据来源。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1988 Oct;88(10):1268-71.
5
Paucity of nutrition and food safety 'news you can use' reveals opportunity for dietetics practitioners.营养资讯匮乏以及食品安全“实用新闻”的缺失为营养从业者带来了机遇。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Feb;98(2):190-3. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00047-9.
6
Foods, health claims, and the law: comparisons of the United States and Europe.食品、健康声称与法律:美国与欧洲之比较
Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:276S-283S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.131.
7
PASSCLAIM - Synthesis and review of existing processes.PASSCLAIM - 现有流程的综合与审查。
Eur J Nutr. 2003 Mar;42 Suppl 1:I96-111. doi: 10.1007/s00394-003-1105-z.
8
A simple way of evaluating the healthiness of ready-to-eat foods and developing healthy foods in the food industry.一种评估即食食品健康程度以及在食品行业开发健康食品的简单方法。
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2006 Feb-Mar;57(1-2):137-42. doi: 10.1080/09637480600658427.
9
Food labeling; nutrient content claims, definition of sodium levels for the term "healthy." Final rule.食品标签;营养成分声称,“健康”一词的钠含量定义。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2005 Sep 29;70(188):56828-49.
10
The availability and cost of healthier food alternatives.更健康食品替代品的可获得性和成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.039.