• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入术治疗心原性休克:单中心经验

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.

机构信息

Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.011
PMID:23453093
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of the transradial approach (TRA) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased in recent years. TRA has a lower mortality rate than the transfemoral approach (TFA) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Comparative studies have systematically excluded patients with cardiogenic shock (CS).

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational registry study of consecutive patients undergoing emergent revascularization between February 2007 and January 2012. An analysis of the clinical evolution of patients with CS during hospitalization was performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,400 emergency procedures, 122 had CS, of which 80 underwent PCI by TRA (65.6%) and 42 underwent PCI by TFA (34.3%). The main reason for choosing TFA was the absence of radial pulse (54.9%). Mortality (64.3% vs 32.5%, P = .001), serious access site complications (11.9% vs 2.5%, P = .03), access site complications requiring blood transfusion (7.1% vs 0%, P = .04), and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, stroke, serious bleeding, and postanoxic encephalopathy) (73.8% vs 43.8%, P = .001) were greater in patients treated by TFA. In the multivariate analysis, TRA was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.39 [0.15-0.97]); other predictive factors were age ≥75 years (3.47 [1.35-8.92]), previous treatment with diuretics (3.67 [1.21-11.12]), and success of the procedure (0.07 [0.02-0.24]).

CONCLUSIONS

Transradial approach for PCI is possible and safe in up to two-thirds of patients with CS. Absence of radial pulse was the main factor preventing use of TRA. In multivariate analysis, TRA was associated with a lower risk of mortality.

摘要

背景

近年来,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中经桡动脉入路(TRA)的应用有所增加。TRA 在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的死亡率低于经股动脉入路(TFA)。比较研究系统地排除了心源性休克(CS)患者。

方法

我们对 2007 年 2 月至 2012 年 1 月期间连续进行紧急血运重建的患者进行了前瞻性、观察性注册研究。对住院期间 CS 患者的临床转归进行了分析。

结果

在 1400 例紧急手术中,有 122 例发生 CS,其中 80 例行 TRA 下 PCI(65.6%),42 例行 TFA 下 PCI(34.3%)。选择 TFA 的主要原因是桡动脉搏动消失(54.9%)。TFA 组死亡率(64.3%比 32.5%,P =.001)、严重入路部位并发症(11.9%比 2.5%,P =.03)、需要输血的入路部位并发症(7.1%比 0%,P =.04)和主要不良心脏事件(死亡、梗死、中风、严重出血和缺血性脑病后)(73.8%比 43.8%,P =.001)更高。多变量分析显示,TRA 是死亡率的预测因素(比值比 [OR] 0.39 [0.15-0.97]);其他预测因素包括年龄≥75 岁(3.47 [1.35-8.92])、利尿剂既往治疗(3.67 [1.21-11.12])和手术成功(0.07 [0.02-0.24])。

结论

TRA 用于 PCI 在多达三分之二的 CS 患者中是可行且安全的。桡动脉搏动消失是阻止使用 TRA 的主要因素。多变量分析显示,TRA 与降低死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入术治疗心原性休克:单中心经验
Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.011.
2
Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.经股动脉入路完全转为经桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可获得相似的成功率,并可迅速减少住院期间心脏和血管主要不良事件。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):345-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A56.
3
Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的风险评分、原因和临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
4
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于心源性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自桡动脉优先中心的经验及已发表研究的荟萃分析
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov;108(11):563-75. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
5
Early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial or femoral approach in patients presenting in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)合并心原性休克患者中桡动脉或股动脉入路的早期和晚期结局。
Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
6
Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.对于熟练的经股动脉操作者而言,经桡动脉途径行无保护左主干冠状动脉介入治疗是否可行?未选择人群的初步经验。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;14(4):193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial.桡动脉入路与 StarClose 夹放置在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较。RADIAMI II:一项前瞻性、随机、单中心试验。
Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(8):763-71.
8
Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.径向入路与股动脉入路在带主动脉内球囊反搏支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较:RADIAL PUMP UP 注册研究。
Am Heart J. 2013 Dec;166(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?经桡动脉与经股动脉冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克:经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗是否适用于高危急性心肌梗死的急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 May;26(5):196-202.
10
The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia.澳大利亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路的兴起。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Nov 27;2020:4397697. doi: 10.1155/2020/4397697. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经桡动脉入路与经股动脉入路在伴心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Sep 5;8(6):640-650. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac018.
2
Improved in-hospital outcome for radial access in a large contemporary cohort of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.在当代一大群接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,经桡动脉途径可改善院内治疗效果。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Jun;11(3):726-735. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-977.
3
Clinical Review: Management of Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
临床综述:急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理
Heart Views. 2020 Oct-Dec;21(4):256-262. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_41_20. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
The Role of the Transradial Approach for Complex Coronary Interventions in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.经桡动脉途径在急性冠状动脉综合征患者复杂冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;8(2):81-86. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.2.81.
5
Transradial Artery Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.经桡动脉途径在ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Feb 24;20(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0607-1.
6
Outcomes of transradial primary percutaneous intervention from a tertiary cardiac centre in Turkey.土耳其一家三级心脏中心经桡动脉进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):11404-11. eCollection 2015.
7
Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulation After Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials and 9,185 Patients.冠状动脉介入治疗后接受口服抗凝治疗患者的抗栓方案:16项临床试验和9185例患者的荟萃分析
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Aug;38(8):499-509. doi: 10.1002/clc.22411. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Impact of guidewire selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure in transradial angiography.导丝选择和术者经验对经桡动脉血管造影术中辐射暴露的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec 5;9(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13019-014-0194-5.
9
Comparison of radial to femoral PCI in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者桡动脉与股动脉途径行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项系统评价
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Jul;40(1):108-17. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1133-y.
10
Is Radial Access and Transradial Cardiac Catheterization Feasible without the Use of Any Vasodilator?不使用任何血管扩张剂时,桡动脉入路及经桡动脉心脏导管插入术是否可行?
Int J Angiol. 2014 Mar;23(1):41-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358384.