• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导丝选择和术者经验对经桡动脉血管造影术中辐射暴露的影响。

Impact of guidewire selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure in transradial angiography.

作者信息

Yang Jianmin, Wang Ningfu, Tong Xiaoshan, Ye Xianhua, Zhou Liang, Tong Guoxin, Shen Yun, Lv Shuzheng

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec 5;9(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13019-014-0194-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-014-0194-5
PMID:25477256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4265418/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have implied that the time of radiation exposure for patients and operators during the transradial approach for coronary angiography (TRA) is associated with the use of different guidewire or catheter and operator's finesse. This study aimed to assess the effects of non-hydrophilic or hydrophilic guidewire and operator expertise on fluoroscopy time and procedure time of TRA and further effects on the procedure safety.

METHODS

A total of 1035 consecutive patients undergoing TRA were recruited prospectively and respectively divided into non-hydrophilic guidewire and hydrophilic guidewire group, or well-experienced group and less-experienced group. The primary endpoints were fluoroscopy time and procedure time. Secondary endpoints included contrast volume, cost, guidewire exchange, switchover and complications .

RESULTS

TRA by non-hydrophilic guidewire group showed shorter fluoroscopy time and procedure time compared with hydrophilic guidewire group, similar results were found between well-experienced group and less-experienced group. Moreover, using of non-hydrophilic guidewire significantly reduced the incidence of hematoma and abnormal guidewie advancement, well-experienced group showed less dosage of contrast volume, lower incidence of radial artery spasm and frequency of guidewire exchange.

CONCLUSIONS

TRA by non-hydrophilic guidewire and well-experienced operator can decrease radiation exposure of patients and operators through reducing the fluoroscopy time and procedure time and further increase procedure safety. These will contribute to the optimization of TRA procedure and promote its widely application.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,在经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影术(TRA)期间,患者和术者的辐射暴露时间与使用不同的导丝或导管以及术者的操作技巧有关。本研究旨在评估非亲水或亲水导丝以及术者经验对TRA透视时间和手术时间的影响,以及对手术安全性的进一步影响。

方法

前瞻性招募了1035例连续接受TRA的患者,分别分为非亲水导丝组和亲水导丝组,或经验丰富组和经验较少组。主要终点为透视时间和手术时间。次要终点包括造影剂用量、费用、导丝更换、转换和并发症。

结果

与亲水导丝组相比,非亲水导丝组的TRA透视时间和手术时间更短,经验丰富组和经验较少组之间也发现了类似结果。此外,使用非亲水导丝显著降低了血肿和导丝异常推进的发生率,经验丰富组的造影剂用量更少,桡动脉痉挛的发生率更低,导丝更换频率更低。

结论

非亲水导丝和经验丰富的术者进行TRA可通过缩短透视时间和手术时间来减少患者和术者的辐射暴露,并进一步提高手术安全性。这些将有助于优化TRA手术并促进其广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c57/4265418/484f2ffafe47/13019_2014_Article_194_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c57/4265418/f33ffadf5f69/13019_2014_Article_194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c57/4265418/484f2ffafe47/13019_2014_Article_194_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c57/4265418/f33ffadf5f69/13019_2014_Article_194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c57/4265418/484f2ffafe47/13019_2014_Article_194_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of guidewire selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure in transradial angiography.导丝选择和术者经验对经桡动脉血管造影术中辐射暴露的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec 5;9(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13019-014-0194-5.
2
Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中,低透视率降低术者和患者放射剂量的效果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
3
Operator radiation exposure during transradial coronary angiography : Effect of single vs. double catheters.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术中术者的辐射暴露:单导管与双导管的影响
Herz. 2018 Sep;43(6):535-542. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4595-9. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的随机对比:RADIAL-CABG 试验(经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的比较)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
5
Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的术者学习曲线:对当代美国实践中开展经桡动脉入路项目的启示
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
6
Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study.入路选择和术者经验对辐射暴露的影响:一项对照前瞻性研究。
Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.011.
7
Learning curve in transradial cardiac catheterization: procedure-related parameters stratified by operators' transradial volume.经桡动脉心脏导管插入术的学习曲线:按术者经桡动脉操作量分层的与操作相关参数
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Nov;24(11):599-604.
8
Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention.经尺动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的安全性和有效性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jul;123(13):1774-9.
9
Feasibility of ulnar artery for cardiac catheterization: AJmer ULnar ARtery (AJULAR) catheterization study.尺动脉用于心脏导管插入术的可行性:阿杰梅尔尺动脉(AJULAR)导管插入术研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;86(1):42-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25806. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
Incidence and predictors of radial artery spasm at the beginning of a transradial coronary procedure.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗开始时桡动脉痉挛的发生率及预测因素。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):208-13. doi: 10.1111/joic.12000. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Retraction note: Impact of guidewire selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure in transradial angiography.撤稿说明:导丝选择和术者经验对经桡动脉血管造影术中辐射暴露的影响
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar 27;10:42. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0251-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating incidence of organ cancer related to PCI radiation exposure in patients treated for acute and chronic total occlusions.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Sep;25(9):441-5.
2
The risk of cataract associated with repeated head and neck CT studies: a nationwide population-based study.与反复头颈部 CT 研究相关的白内障风险:一项基于全国人口的研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):626-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9652.
3
Ionizing radiation and atherosclerosis: current knowledge and future challenges.离子辐射与动脉粥样硬化:现有知识与未来挑战。
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Sep;230(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk of patients with ischemic heart diseases from diagnostic and therapeutic imaging procedures.诊断和治疗性影像学检查对缺血性心脏病患者的累积辐射暴露与癌症风险。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):1926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
5
Radial artery spasm associated with transradial cardiovascular procedures: results from the RAS registry.经桡动脉心血管介入术后发生的桡动脉痉挛:RAS 注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E32-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25082. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
6
Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators.经经验丰富的操作人员行经桡动脉或股动脉途径冠状动脉造影时的辐射暴露。
Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.016.
7
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入术治疗心原性休克:单中心经验
Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.011.
8
Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中左、右桡动脉入路时术者 X 射线暴露:OPERA 随机研究。
Heart. 2013 Apr;99(7):480-4. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302895. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study.入路选择和术者经验对辐射暴露的影响:一项对照前瞻性研究。
Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.011.
10
Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for vascular complications and bleeding.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路:血管并发症和出血的影响。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):502-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0287-5.