Suppr超能文献

经桡动脉与经股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本比较:来自 Premier 研究数据库的队列分析。

Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database.

机构信息

St. Lukes's Mid America Heart Institute, St Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):303-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transradial intervention (TRI) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with shorter length of stay, fewer bleeding complications, and higher patient satisfaction. Less is known about the economic implications of TRI in contemporary practice.

METHODS

This is a retrospective inpatient cohort analysis using medical data from the Premier research database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC), which contains approximately one-fifth of all acute care hospitalizations in the US annually. The database was queried to identify patients undergoing PCI from 2004 to 2009. Patients with TRI were identified by center-level charge codes for radial-specific devices and matched one-to-many with patients undergoing transfemoral intervention (TFI). Adjusted total hospitalization costs were compared between patients undergoing TRI and TFI. Patients were additionally classified by periprocedural risk of bleeding as low (<1%), moderate (1%-3%), and high (>3%).

RESULTS

There were 609 TRI cases matched with 60,900 TFI cases. Total adjusted costs for TRI were $11,736 ± $6,748 vs $12,288 ± $23,418 for TFI, a difference of $553 favoring TRI (95% CI $45-$1,060, P = .033). Day-of-procedure costs were similar, at $17 higher for TRI compared with TFI (95% CI -$318 to $353, P = .37); however, costs from the following day until discharge were significantly lower for TRI (-$571, 95 % CI -$912 to $229, P = .001). Postprocedure costs were lower for patients with TRI vs patients with TFI at moderate (-$478, 95% CI -$887 to $69, P = .022) and high (-$917, 95% CI -$1,814 to $19, P = .045) risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide administrative hospital database, transradial compared with transfemoral PCI access was associated with lower average direct hospital costs and shorter length of hospital stay. Postprocedure costs associated with TRI were also lower in patients at greater bleeding risk.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的经桡动脉介入(TRI)与较短的住院时间、较少的出血并发症和更高的患者满意度相关。关于 TRI 在当代实践中的经济意义,人们知之甚少。

方法

这是一项使用来自 Premier 研究数据库(Premier Inc,夏洛特,NC)的医疗数据的回顾性住院患者队列分析,该数据库每年包含美国约五分之一的急性护理住院患者。通过中心级别的桡动脉专用设备收费代码对接受 PCI 的患者进行查询,并与接受经股动脉介入(TFI)的患者进行一对一匹配。比较接受 TRI 和 TFI 的患者的总住院费用。根据围手术期出血风险,患者进一步分为低(<1%)、中(1%-3%)和高(>3%)。

结果

有 609 例 TRI 病例与 60900 例 TFI 病例相匹配。TRI 的总调整费用为 11736 美元±6748 美元,而 TFI 的总调整费用为 12288 美元±23418 美元,TRI 组费用低 553 美元(95%CI:45-1060 美元,P =.033)。手术当天的费用相似,TRI 组比 TFI 组高 17 美元(95%CI:-318 美元至 353 美元,P =.37);然而,TRI 组从手术次日至出院的费用明显较低(-571 美元,95%CI:-912 美元至 229 美元,P =.001)。与 TFI 相比,TRI 组的中度(-478 美元,95%CI:-887 美元至 69 美元,P =.022)和高度(-917 美元,95%CI:-1814 美元至 19 美元,P =.045)出血风险患者的术后费用较低。

结论

在全国性的医院行政数据库中,与经股动脉 PCI 相比,经桡动脉 PCI 可降低平均直接住院费用和缩短住院时间。出血风险较高的患者接受 TRI 后的费用也较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验