Adhikari Samrachana, Rose Sherri, Normand Sharon-Lise
Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(532):1635-1644. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1688663. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are nonsurgical procedures to open blocked blood vessels to the heart, frequently using a catheter to place a stent. The catheter can be inserted into the blood vessels using an artery in the groin or an artery in the wrist. Because clinical trials have indicated that access via the wrist may result in fewer post procedure complications, shortening the length of stay, and ultimately cost less than groin access, adoption of access via the wrist has been encouraged. However, patients treated in usual care are likely to differ from those participating in clinical trials, and there is reason to believe that the effectiveness of wrist access may differ between males and females. Moreover, the choice of artery access strategy is likely to be influenced by patient or physician unmeasured factors. To study the effectiveness of the two artery access site strategies on hospitalization charges, we use data from a state-mandated clinical registry including 7,963 patients undergoing PCI. A hierarchical Bayesian likelihood-based instrumental variable analysis under a latent index modeling framework is introduced to jointly model outcomes and treatment status. Our approach accounts for unobserved heterogeneity via a latent factor structure, and permits nonparametric error distributions with Dirichlet process mixture models. Our results demonstrate that artery access in the wrist reduces hospitalization charges compared to access in the groin, with a higher mean reduction for male patients.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是一种通过非手术方式来打通心脏堵塞血管的治疗方法,通常会使用导管来放置支架。导管可通过腹股沟处的动脉或手腕处的动脉插入血管。由于临床试验表明,经手腕进行介入治疗术后并发症可能更少,住院时间更短,且最终费用低于经腹股沟介入治疗,因此鼓励采用经手腕的介入方式。然而,接受常规治疗的患者可能与参与临床试验的患者有所不同,而且有理由相信,经手腕介入治疗的有效性在男性和女性之间可能存在差异。此外,动脉入路策略的选择可能会受到患者或医生未测量因素的影响。为了研究两种动脉入路策略对住院费用的有效性,我们使用了来自一个州规定的临床登记处的数据,该数据包含7963名接受PCI治疗的患者。我们引入了一种基于分层贝叶斯似然的工具变量分析方法,该方法在潜在指数建模框架下对结果和治疗状态进行联合建模。我们的方法通过潜在因子结构来考虑未观察到的异质性,并允许使用狄利克雷过程混合模型进行非参数误差分布。我们的结果表明,与经腹股沟入路相比,经手腕动脉入路可降低住院费用,男性患者的平均费用降低幅度更大。