• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对农村人口的社区导向型初级保健项目:降低心血管疾病风险。

A community-oriented primary care project in a rural population: reducing cardiovascular risk.

作者信息

Gold M R, Franks P

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, New York 14620.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;30(6):639-44.

PMID:2345332
Abstract

A controlled community-oriented primary care (COPC) program designed to reduce cardiovascular risk was conducted in two towns in a poor, rural area of New York State that have populations with high levels of cardiovascular mortality. In both towns, house-to-house visits were used to screen for blood pressure, gather information about cardiovascular risk knowledge and behavior, and provide a cardiovascular educational program. Persons with elevated blood pressure were advised to seek follow-up. Additional interventions, carried out in the study town only, included ongoing follow-up for those with elevated blood pressure and their providers, and sliding-fee medical services for those with financial barriers to care. At rescreening 2 years later, residents of the study population had an adjusted systolic blood pressure 3.1 mm Hg lower than those in the control population (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9, 5.3). Furthermore, those who were screened at both rounds had an adjusted systolic blood pressure 2.7 mm Hg lower than those who had not previously been screened (95% CI = 0.6, 4.8). Although knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors increased among those who were surveyed in both rounds, there was little demonstrable effect on cardiovascular risk behaviors. Difficulties were encountered in engaging the participation of all medical providers, and less use was made of the sliding-scale program than expected. While it appears feasible to implement the technical methodology of a COPC model in a rural setting, it is crucial to engage the support of the local and medical community.

摘要

在纽约州一个贫穷农村地区的两个城镇开展了一项旨在降低心血管疾病风险的以社区为导向的初级保健(COPC)对照项目,这两个城镇的心血管疾病死亡率很高。在这两个城镇,通过挨家挨户走访来筛查血压、收集心血管疾病风险知识和行为方面的信息,并提供心血管疾病教育项目。血压升高的人被建议寻求后续治疗。仅在研究城镇实施的额外干预措施包括对血压升高者及其医疗服务提供者进行持续随访,以及为那些在获得医疗服务方面存在经济障碍的人提供按比例收费的医疗服务。在两年后的重新筛查中,研究人群的居民调整后的收缩压比对照人群低3.1毫米汞柱(95%置信区间[CI]=0.9,5.3)。此外,在两轮筛查中都接受筛查的人调整后的收缩压比之前未接受过筛查的人低2.7毫米汞柱(95%CI=0.6,4.8)。虽然在两轮调查中接受调查的人对心血管疾病风险因素的了解有所增加,但对心血管疾病风险行为几乎没有明显影响。在促使所有医疗服务提供者参与方面遇到了困难,而且按比例收费项目的使用比预期少。虽然在农村地区实施COPC模式的技术方法似乎是可行的,但获得当地和医疗社区的支持至关重要。

相似文献

1
A community-oriented primary care project in a rural population: reducing cardiovascular risk.一项针对农村人口的社区导向型初级保健项目:降低心血管疾病风险。
J Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;30(6):639-44.
2
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
3
Barriers to cholesterol testing in a rural community.农村社区胆固醇检测的障碍。
J Fam Pract. 1991 Jun;32(6):614-8.
4
Different outcomes for different interventions with different focus!--A cross-country comparison of community interventions in rural Swedish and US populations.针对不同重点的不同干预措施会产生不同结果!——瑞典农村和美国人群社区干预措施的跨国比较。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;56:46-58.
5
The Otsego-Schoharie healthy heart program: prevention of cardiovascular disease in the rural US.奥塞戈-肖哈里健康心脏项目:美国农村地区心血管疾病的预防
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;56:21-32.
6
Cardiovascular disease risk management in a primary health care setting of north India.印度北部基层医疗环境中的心血管疾病风险管理
Indian Heart J. 2008 Jan-Feb;60(1):19-25.
7
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
8
Workplace-based cardiovascular risk management by community pharmacists: impact on blood pressure, lipid levels, and weight.社区药剂师在工作场所进行的心血管风险管理:对血压、血脂水平和体重的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Oct;26(10):1511-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.10.1511.
9
Can a sustainable community intervention reduce the health gap?--10-year evaluation of a Swedish community intervention program for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.一项可持续的社区干预措施能否缩小健康差距?——对瑞典一项预防心血管疾病的社区干预项目的10年评估
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;56:59-68.
10
[Can systematic general health screening and patient-physician health discussions improve the cardiovascular profile of the population? A randomized controlled trial in general practice with a 5-year follow-up].[系统的全面健康筛查和医患健康讨论能否改善人群的心血管状况?一项在全科医疗中进行的为期5年随访的随机对照试验]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jun 17;164(25):3354-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement strategies to promote recruitment and participation in clinical research among rural communities: A narrative review.促进农村社区参与临床研究招募与参与的社区参与策略:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e84. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.16. eCollection 2023.
2
A systematic review of published interventions for primary and secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in rural populations of Australia.对澳大利亚农村地区缺血性心脏病(IHD)一级和二级预防已发表干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 27;16(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3548-1.