Institute of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Sector H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Aug;141:2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.140. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
A bench-scale conventional membrane bioreactor (C-MBR), a moving bed membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and an anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR), operating under similar feed, environmental and operating conditions, were each evaluated for their treatment performance and bacterial diversity. MBRs were compared for the removal of organics (COD) and nutrients (N and P) while pure culture techniques were employed for bacterial isolation and an API 20E kit was used to identify the isolates. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, selected as a representative of denitrifying microorganisms, was isolated only from the A/O-MBR using Citrimide Agar. Using PCR, the nitrifying bacteria Nitrosomonas europaea was detected only in the MB-MBR. On the other hand, Nitrobacter winogradskyi was detected in all three reactors. Addition of media and maintenance of a lesser DO resulted in the highest TN removal in the A/O-MBR as compared to the C-MBR and the MB-MBR, whereas better nitrification was observed in the MB-MBR than in the C-MBR.
采用批式常规膜生物反应器(C-MBR)、移动床膜生物反应器(MB-MBR)和缺氧/好氧膜生物反应器(A/O-MBR),在相似的进水、环境和运行条件下,分别评估了它们的处理性能和细菌多样性。比较了 MBR 对有机物(COD)和营养物(N 和 P)的去除效果,同时采用纯培养技术进行细菌分离,并使用 API 20E 试剂盒对分离物进行鉴定。选择铜绿假单胞菌作为反硝化微生物的代表,仅从 A/O-MBR 中用柠檬酸琼脂分离出来。使用 PCR 仅在 MB-MBR 中检测到硝化细菌欧洲亚硝化单胞菌。另一方面,在所有三个反应器中都检测到了硝化杆菌。与 C-MBR 和 MB-MBR 相比,在 A/O-MBR 中添加培养基和维持较低的 DO 可实现最高的 TN 去除率,而在 MB-MBR 中观察到的硝化作用优于 C-MBR。