Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Resuscitation. 2013 Aug;84(8):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
This study aimed to determine whether active post-resuscitation care (APRC) was associated with improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes on a nationwide level.
We used a national OHCA cohort database consisting of hospital and ambulance data. We included all survivors of OHCA, excluding patients with non-cardiac etiology, younger than 15 years, and with unknown outcomes, from (2008 to 2010). The APRC was defined when the OHCA patients received mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) or active cardiac care (ACC), such as intravenous thrombolysis, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion, as well as routine intensive care; patients receiving conservative post-resuscitation care (CPRC) served as the other group. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival to discharge and a good neurological outcome (cerebral performance category [CPC] 1-2), respectively. We extracted propensity-matched samples to control for selection bias. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the APRC and CPRC groups adjusting for potential risks to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Of total 64,155 patients, 4557 survived to admission and were included in the final analysis. Out of these patients, 1599 (35.1%) cases survived to discharge, and 499 (11.0%) cases were discharged with good neurological recoveries. Overall, 695 cases (15.3%) received any APRC, including MTH (n=377, 8.3%) and ACC (370, 8.1%). The outcomes was better in the APRC group than in the CPRC group for survival to discharge (58.7% vs. 30.8%, p<0.001) and good neurological outcome (27.2% vs. 8.0%, p<0.001), respectively. In the total cohort, the adjusted ORs of the APRC group compared to those the CPRC group were 2.15 (95% CI 1.78-2.59) for survival to discharge and 2.54 (95% CI 1.98-3.27) for a good neurological outcome. In the propensity score-matched cohort, the adjusted ORs for survival to discharge and good neurological outcome of APRC were significantly favorable.
Active post-resuscitation care resulted in significantly improved outcomes in adult OHCA patients with a presumed cardiac etiology in a nationwide, retrospective, observational study.
本研究旨在确定在全国范围内,复苏后积极治疗(APRC)是否与改善院外心脏骤停(OHCA)结局相关。
我们使用了一个包含医院和救护车数据的全国性 OHCA 队列数据库。我们纳入了 OHCA 幸存者,排除了非心源性病因、年龄小于 15 岁和结局未知的患者,时间范围为(2008 年至 2010 年)。当 OHCA 患者接受亚低温治疗(MTH)或积极的心脏治疗(ACC),如静脉溶栓、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、冠状动脉旁路手术和起搏器/植入式除颤器插入,以及常规强化护理时,定义为 APRC;接受保守复苏后治疗(CPRC)的患者为另一组。主要和次要结局分别为出院时存活和良好的神经功能结局(脑功能分类[CPC]1-2)。我们提取了倾向匹配样本,以控制选择偏差。使用多变量逻辑回归分析比较 APRC 和 CPRC 组,调整潜在风险以计算调整后的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。在总共 64155 名患者中,有 4557 名存活至入院并纳入最终分析。在这些患者中,有 1599 例(35.1%)存活至出院,499 例(11.0%)出院时神经功能良好。总体而言,有 695 例(15.3%)接受了任何 APRC,包括 MTH(n=377,8.3%)和 ACC(370,8.1%)。与 CPRC 组相比,APRC 组的出院生存率(58.7%比 30.8%,p<0.001)和良好的神经功能结局(27.2%比 8.0%,p<0.001)更好。在总队列中,APRC 组与 CPRC 组相比,出院生存率的调整 OR 为 2.15(95%CI 1.78-2.59),良好的神经功能结局的调整 OR 为 2.54(95%CI 1.98-3.27)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,APRC 组出院和良好神经功能结局的调整 OR 明显有利。
在一项全国性、回顾性、观察性研究中,对于患有推定心脏病因的成年 OHCA 患者,复苏后积极治疗可显著改善结局。