Suppr超能文献

广泛的细胞减灭术治疗阑尾癌转移:发病率、死亡率和生存率。

Extensive cytoreductive surgery for appendiceal carcinomatosis: morbidity, mortality, and survival.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1056-62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2791-7. Epub 2013 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) are frequently used to treat appendiceal carcinomatosis. Some patients require multivisceral resection because of the volume of disease. It is unclear whether extent of CRS impacts survival in appendiceal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

We analyzed 282 patients undergoing attempted CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal carcinomatosis. Patients were defined as having undergone Extensive CRS (n = 60) if they had >3 organ resections or >2 anastomoses; a subgroup of Extreme CRS patients (n = 10) had ≥5 organ resections and ≥3 anastomoses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox-regression models were used to identify prognostic factors affecting outcomes.

RESULTS

Relative to the comparison group, patients undergoing Extensive CRS had a higher median peritoneal carcinomatosis index, operative duration, blood loss, and length of stay. No difference in completeness of cytoreduction, severe morbidity, or 60-day mortality was evident. Subgroup analysis of 10 patients undergoing extreme CRS likewise revealed no increase in severe morbidity or mortality. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23.5 and 74 months in the comparison group; 18.5 (p = 0.086) and 51 (p = 0.85) months in the Extensive CRS group; and 40 months and not reached in the Extreme CRS subgroup. In a multivariable analysis, extent of CRS was not independently associated with PFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive CRS is associated with greater OR time, blood loss, and length of stay, but is not associated with higher morbidity, mortality, or inferior oncologic outcomes in patients with appendiceal carcinomatosis.

摘要

背景

细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)常用于治疗阑尾类癌转移。由于病变范围广泛,部分患者需要进行多脏器切除术。目前尚不清楚 CRS 的彻底程度是否会影响阑尾类癌转移患者的生存。

方法

我们分析了 282 例接受 CRS/HIPEC 治疗的阑尾类癌转移患者。如果患者接受了超过 3 个器官切除术或超过 2 个吻合术,则定义为广泛 CRS(n=60);如果患者接受了≥5 个器官切除术和≥3 个吻合术,则定义为极端 CRS 患者亚组(n=10)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和多变量 Cox 回归模型来确定影响结果的预后因素。

结果

与对照组相比,广泛 CRS 患者的腹膜癌指数、手术时间、出血量和住院时间中位数更高。在完全减瘤程度、严重发病率或 60 天死亡率方面没有差异。对 10 例接受极端 CRS 患者的亚组分析同样没有发现严重发病率或死亡率增加。对照组患者的中位无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)分别为 23.5 个月和 74 个月;广泛 CRS 组患者分别为 18.5 个月(p=0.086)和 51 个月(p=0.85);极端 CRS 亚组患者分别为 40 个月和未达到。多变量分析显示,CRS 的范围与 PFS 或 OS 无独立相关性。

结论

广泛 CRS 与手术时间、出血量和住院时间延长有关,但与阑尾类癌转移患者的高发病率、死亡率或较差的肿瘤学结果无关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验