Madzimure James, Nyahangare Emmanuel T, Hamudikuwanda Humphrey, Hove Thokozani, Belmain Steve R, Stevenson Philip C, Mvumi Brighton M
Discipline of Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Aug;45(6):1341-7. doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0367-6. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
The efficacy of Solanum incanum and Strychnos spinosa aqueous fruit extracts was evaluated against cattle ticks in on-station experiments and laboratory tick bioassays. In the on-station experiment using cattle, fruit extracts were applied at three concentrations 5, 10, and 20 % (w/v) and compared with a commercial acaricide, Tickbuster (amitraz) spray (positive control) and no treatment (negative control). The treatments were applied at weekly intervals for 6 weeks as surface sprays on 32 Mashona cattle in a completely randomized design experiment. Ticks on individual cattle were identified, counted, and recorded daily. Peripheral blood samples were collected for parasite screening. In the laboratory, tick bioassays were conducted at four concentrations, 5, 10, 20, and 40% (w/v) fruit extracts compared to Tickbuster (amitraz) spray (positive control) and distilled water (negative control). The extracts were incubated with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus tick larvae and mortalities for each treatment level recorded after 24 and 48 h. The 5% Solanum incanum treatment had higher efficacy ratio (P < 0.05) than the other fruit extract concentrations of the same plant species. Efficacy ratio was higher (P < 0.05) in the 5% S. spinosa-treated cattle than in the untreated control but lower (P < 0.05) than that for the amitraz treatment. The bioassays indicated that there was a high efficacy ratio for the lowest fruit extract concentrations when ticks were exposed to acaricidal treatments for 48 h compared to 24 h. Overall, the results indicate that Solanum incanum and Strychnos spinosa individually have some acaricidal effect.
在站内实验和实验室蜱虫生物测定中,评估了白英和马钱子果实水提取物对牛蜱的防治效果。在使用牛的站内实验中,以5%、10%和20%(w/v)三种浓度施用果实提取物,并与市售杀螨剂Tickbuster(双甲脒)喷雾(阳性对照)和不进行处理(阴性对照)进行比较。在一项完全随机设计实验中,以每周一次的间隔,对32头马绍纳牛进行为期6周的表面喷雾处理。每天对每头牛身上的蜱虫进行鉴定、计数和记录。采集外周血样本进行寄生虫筛查。在实验室中,与Tickbuster(双甲脒)喷雾(阳性对照)和蒸馏水(阴性对照)相比,以5%、10%、20%和40%(w/v)四种浓度的果实提取物进行蜱虫生物测定。将提取物与微小牛蜱幼虫一起孵育,并在24小时和48小时后记录每个处理水平的死亡率。5%白英处理的效果比同一植物物种的其他果实提取物浓度更高(P < 0.05)。5%马钱子处理的牛的效果比未处理的对照更高(P < 0.05),但比双甲脒处理更低(P < 0.05)。生物测定表明,与24小时相比,蜱虫在杀螨处理下暴露48小时时,最低果实提取物浓度的效果比更高。总体而言,结果表明白英和马钱子各自具有一定的杀螨作用。