Suppr超能文献

An examination of the efficiency of some quality assurance methods commonly employed in clinical trials.

作者信息

Neaton J D, Duchene A G, Svendsen K H, Wentworth D

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55414.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):115-23; discussion 124. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090118.

Abstract

The cost and efficiency of training clinical centre staff and of duplicate data entry in clinical trials is reviewed. Training is an essential component of quality assurance programmes and it is usually carried out at regular intervals in long-term clinical trials. Initial training of staff and regular retraining is important to assure standardization and it can lead to reduced trial costs. Interim training for new staff and for remedial purposes is less efficient than regularly scheduled training sessions. Regional centres for training and the use of computer aided instruction are two ways such interim training can be made more efficient and standardized. Duplicate data entry or verification can result in a substantial reduction in data entry errors depending on the nature of the data being keyed. Selective verification should especially be considered for important fields for which consistency checks cannot be performed, that are alphabetic or that are several characters in length. Quality assurance procedures should be implemented to monitor data entry accuracy in clinical trials.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验