Chrastina Jan, Novák Zdenek, Baláž Marek, Říha Ivo, Bočková Martina, Rektor Ivan
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's Teaching Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Br J Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;27(5):676-82. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.771726. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
Although microrecording is common in subthalamic stimulation, microelectrode monitoring prolongs surgical time and may increase the risk of haemorrhagic complications. The main reason for electrophysiological mapping is the discrepancy between the calculated anatomical and final electrophysiological targets. The aim of this paper is to describe the relationship between anatomical and electrophysiological targets defined as the best electrophysiological recordings from multiple parallel electrode tracts, explaining the target discrepancy with attention paid to the role of brain shift and patient- and disease-related factors.
Subthalamic electrodes were stereotactically implanted in 58 patients using microrecording by means of parallel electrodes at defined distances. The relationship between the final electrode placement to its anatomical trajectory and the relationship between the definitive electrodes implanted on the right and left sides were analysed, as was the influence of patient age, Parkinson's disease duration, and late motor complications duration.
Final electrode placement matched the anatomical trajectory in 53.4% of patients on the right side and 43.1% of patients on the left side. Electrode positions were symmetrical in 38.3% of patients. The analysis of left and right electrode positions does not prove a statistically significant prevalence of lateral and posterior final electrode trajectories as could be expected from lateral and posterior movements of the brain caused by brain shift, although there was some tendency for a larger percentage of lateral electrodes on the left side. Age, Parkinson's disease duration, and L-DOPA effect duration were not confirmed as responsible factors.
The difference between anatomical trajectory and final electrode placement supports the use of functional microelectrode monitoring in subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain shift is not the only causative factor of the difference. The possible roles of age, Parkinson's disease duration, and late motor complications duration were also not confirmed by study results.
尽管微记录在丘脑底核刺激中很常见,但微电极监测会延长手术时间,并可能增加出血并发症的风险。电生理图谱绘制的主要原因是计算出的解剖靶点与最终电生理靶点之间存在差异。本文旨在描述解剖靶点与电生理靶点之间的关系,将其定义为来自多个平行电极束的最佳电生理记录,并在关注脑移位以及患者和疾病相关因素作用的情况下解释靶点差异。
通过立体定向技术,以规定距离使用平行电极对58例患者植入丘脑底核电极并进行微记录。分析了最终电极位置与其解剖轨迹之间的关系,以及左右两侧植入的最终电极之间的关系,同时分析了患者年龄、帕金森病病程和晚期运动并发症病程的影响。
右侧53.4%的患者以及左侧43.1%的患者,最终电极位置与解剖轨迹相符。38.3%的患者电极位置对称。尽管左侧外侧电极的比例有稍高的趋势,但对左右电极位置进行分析后发现,并未证明外侧和后部最终电极轨迹在统计学上具有显著的优势,而这是脑移位导致脑部出现外侧和后部移动所预期的结果。年龄、帕金森病病程和左旋多巴效应持续时间未被证实为相关因素。
解剖轨迹与最终电极位置之间的差异支持在丘脑底核深部脑刺激中使用功能性微电极监测。脑移位并非造成这种差异的唯一原因。研究结果也未证实年龄、帕金森病病程和晚期运动并发症病程可能发挥的作用。