Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
Mobile health interventions could have beneficial effects on health care delivery processes. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of controlled trials of mobile technology interventions to improve health care delivery processes.
We searched for all controlled trials of mobile technology based health interventions using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, UK NHS HTA (Jan 1990-Sept 2010). Two authors independently extracted data on allocation concealment, allocation sequence, blinding, completeness of follow-up, and measures of effect. We calculated effect estimates and we used random effects meta-analysis to give pooled estimates. We identified 42 trials. None of the trials had low risk of bias. Seven trials of health care provider support reported 25 outcomes regarding appropriate disease management, of which 11 showed statistically significant benefits. One trial reported a statistically significant improvement in nurse/surgeon communication using mobile phones. Two trials reported statistically significant reductions in correct diagnoses using mobile technology photos compared to gold standard. The pooled effect on appointment attendance using text message (short message service or SMS) reminders versus no reminder was increased, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.06 (95% CI 1.05-1.07, I(2) = 6%). The pooled effects on the number of cancelled appointments was not significantly increased RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.89-1.30). There was no difference in attendance using SMS reminders versus other reminders (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.02, respectively). To address the limitation of the older search, we also reviewed more recent literature.
The results for health care provider support interventions on diagnosis and management outcomes are generally consistent with modest benefits. Trials using mobile technology-based photos reported reductions in correct diagnoses when compared to the gold standard. SMS appointment reminders have modest benefits and may be appropriate for implementation. High quality trials measuring clinical outcomes are needed. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
移动健康干预措施可能对医疗保健服务流程产生有益影响。我们旨在对移动技术干预措施改善医疗保健服务流程的对照试验进行系统评价。
我们使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、全球卫生、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、英国 NHS HTA(1990 年 1 月至 2010 年 9 月)搜索了所有基于移动技术的健康干预措施的对照试验。两位作者独立提取关于分配隐藏、分配序列、盲法、随访完整性和效果测量的资料。我们计算了效果估计值,并使用随机效应荟萃分析得出了汇总估计值。我们确定了 42 项试验。没有一项试验具有低偏倚风险。7 项医疗保健提供者支持试验报告了 25 项关于适当疾病管理的结果,其中 11 项显示出统计学上的显著益处。一项试验报告称,使用移动电话进行护士/外科医生之间的沟通有了统计学上的显著改善。两项试验报告称,与金标准相比,使用移动技术照片进行诊断可显著提高正确诊断率。使用短信(短消息服务或 SMS)提醒而不是不提醒来提高预约就诊率的汇总效果,相对风险(RR)为 1.06(95%置信区间 1.05-1.07,I²=6%)。使用 SMS 提醒取消预约的数量没有显著增加 RR 1.08(95%置信区间 0.89-1.30)。SMS 提醒与其他提醒相比,在就诊率方面没有差异(RR 0.98,95%置信区间 0.94-1.02)。为了解决早期搜索的局限性,我们还回顾了最近的文献。
关于医疗保健提供者支持干预措施对诊断和管理结果的影响,结果通常与适度的益处一致。使用基于移动技术的照片的试验报告称,与金标准相比,正确诊断率有所降低。SMS 预约提醒有适度的益处,可能适合实施。需要高质量的试验来测量临床结果。请稍后在文章中查看编辑摘要。