• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能机器学习驱动的门诊预约管理:关于可接受性的定性研究

Artificial intelligence machine learning-driven outpatient appointment management: A qualitative study on acceptability.

作者信息

Wood Kerry V, Frings Daniel, Flood Chris, Thomas Nicola

机构信息

Department of Psychology, London South Bank University, London, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251321016. doi: 10.1177/20552076251321016. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076251321016
PMID:40538469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12177252/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Managing outpatient appointments is challenging, with missed appointments wasting capacity. Artificial Intelligence (AI) machine learning-driven automated reminders offer a solution, but their success relies on patient and staff engagement, highlighting the need for impact assessment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the acceptability of AI machine learning-driven appointment management for patients and staff, identifying barriers and facilitators.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with seven staff and twelve patients. Despite scheduling efforts and incentives, practical constraints limited the sample size and generalizability. Interviews were analysed separately using Thematic Analysis, with one researcher coding and categorizing data, followed by discussions to refine themes and validate quotes.

RESULTS

Five themes emerged. Patients: ethical concerns, AI understanding, reminder efficacy, user satisfaction, and usability. Staff: AI understanding and hesitancy, barriers and drivers, technology experiences, appointment management, and sustainability. Barriers included privacy concerns, limited interactivity, fragmented integration, and operational challenges. Facilitators were perceived prediction accuracy and reminder usefulness. Patients valued usability, convenience, and reminders but sought better interactivity and integration. Staff emphasized ethics, operations, and sustainability, with motivation linked to reduced DNAs. Both valued accuracy and reliability, highlighting the need for tailored strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explores patient and staff perceptions of AI in NHS appointment management. Despite high trust in data security, privacy concerns, inefficiencies, and limited interactivity hinder adoption. Accuracy and convenience drive engagement. Findings highlight the need for better integration, clarity, interactivity, and accessibility to enhance user experience and AI adoption in healthcare.

摘要

引言

管理门诊预约颇具挑战性,错过的预约会造成资源浪费。人工智能(AI)机器学习驱动的自动提醒提供了一种解决方案,但其成功依赖于患者和工作人员的参与,这凸显了进行影响评估的必要性。

目的

调查患者和工作人员对人工智能机器学习驱动的预约管理的可接受性,识别障碍和促进因素。

方法

对7名工作人员和12名患者进行半结构化访谈。尽管进行了排班努力和激励措施,但实际限制因素限制了样本量和普遍性。使用主题分析法分别对访谈进行分析,由一名研究人员对数据进行编码和分类,随后进行讨论以完善主题并验证引述内容。

结果

出现了五个主题。患者方面:伦理问题、对人工智能的理解、提醒效果、用户满意度和可用性。工作人员方面:对人工智能的理解和犹豫、障碍和驱动因素、技术体验、预约管理和可持续性。障碍包括隐私担忧、互动性有限、整合碎片化和运营挑战。促进因素是感知到的预测准确性和提醒有用性。患者重视可用性、便利性和提醒,但寻求更好的互动性和整合。工作人员强调伦理、运营和可持续性,积极性与减少爽约相关。双方都重视准确性和可靠性,凸显了制定量身定制策略的必要性。

结论

本研究探讨了患者和工作人员对国民保健服务(NHS)预约管理中人工智能的看法。尽管对数据安全高度信任,但隐私担忧、效率低下和互动性有限阻碍了其采用。准确性和便利性推动了参与度。研究结果凸显了需要更好的整合、清晰度、互动性和可及性,以提升医疗保健中的用户体验和人工智能采用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd8f/12177252/43964fd8cab5/10.1177_20552076251321016-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd8f/12177252/43964fd8cab5/10.1177_20552076251321016-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd8f/12177252/43964fd8cab5/10.1177_20552076251321016-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence machine learning-driven outpatient appointment management: A qualitative study on acceptability.人工智能机器学习驱动的门诊预约管理:关于可接受性的定性研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251321016. doi: 10.1177/20552076251321016. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Expectations and Requirements of Surgical Staff for an AI-Supported Clinical Decision Support System for Older Patients: Qualitative Study.外科医护人员对用于老年患者的人工智能支持临床决策支持系统的期望与要求:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 17;7:e57899. doi: 10.2196/57899.
3
Navigating artificial intelligence in home healthcare: challenges and opportunities in nursing wound care.在家居医疗保健中运用人工智能:护理伤口护理的挑战与机遇
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;24(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03348-7.
4
Adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare: survey of health system priorities, successes, and challenges.医疗保健领域人工智能的应用:卫生系统优先事项、成功案例及挑战的调查
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1093-1100. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf065.
5
Barriers to and Facilitators of Using eHealth to Support Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Self-management: Systematic Literature Review of Perceptions of Health Care Professionals and Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.利用电子健康支持妊娠糖尿病自我管理的障碍和促进因素:医疗保健专业人员和妊娠糖尿病患者感知的系统文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 27;24(10):e39689. doi: 10.2196/39689.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Health Education and Practice: A Systematic Review of Health Students' and Academics' Knowledge, Perceptions and Experiences.健康教育与实践中的人工智能:对健康专业学生和学者的知识、认知与经验的系统综述
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Jun;72(2):e70045. doi: 10.1111/inr.70045.
7
Designing Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)-A User-Centered Lens of the Design Characteristics, Challenges, and Implications: Systematic Review.设计临床决策支持系统(CDSS)——基于用户中心视角的设计特征、挑战及影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e63733. doi: 10.2196/63733.
8
Redefining Mentorship in Medical Education with Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study on the Feasibility and Implications.利用人工智能重新定义医学教育中的导师指导:关于可行性和影响的德尔菲研究
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun 18:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2521001.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Perspectives and Experiences of Nurse Managers on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Work Environments and Managerial Processes: A Qualitative Study.护士长对人工智能对护理工作环境和管理流程影响的观点与经验:一项定性研究
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Jun;72(2):e70043. doi: 10.1111/inr.70043.

本文引用的文献

1
A realist review of the causes of, and current interventions to address 'missingness' in health care.关于医疗保健中“缺失”现象的成因及当前应对措施的实证性综述。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Aug 1;3:33. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13431.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.人工智能在改善心脏病治疗效果中的应用:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Apr 2;149(14):e1028-e1050. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001201. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
A framework for examining patient attitudes regarding applications of artificial intelligence in healthcare.
一个用于审视患者对人工智能在医疗保健领域应用的态度的框架。
Digit Health. 2022 Mar 24;8:20552076221089084. doi: 10.1177/20552076221089084. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Enhancing Usability of Appointment Reminders: Qualitative Interviews of Patients Receiving Care in the Veterans Health Administration.增强预约提醒的可用性:接受退伍军人健康管理局护理的患者的定性访谈。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):121-128. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06183-5. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
5
Health Policy and Privacy Challenges Associated With Digital Technology.数字技术相关的健康政策和隐私挑战。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e208285. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8285.
6
The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健领域的潜力。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):94-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
7
Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge.人工智能与实施挑战
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e13659. doi: 10.2196/13659.
8
Artificial intelligence in healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):719-731. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.医疗保健干预措施的可接受性:综述概述及理论框架的构建
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
10
Patients will be told cost of missed appointments and may be charged.患者将被告知错过预约的费用,并且可能会被收费。
BMJ. 2015 Jul 5;351:h3663. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3663.