• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国各医院的剖宫产率差异高达十倍;降低这种差异可能有助于解决质量和成本问题。

Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):527-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030
PMID:23459732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3615450/
Abstract

Cesarean delivery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States, and cesarean rates are increasing. Working with 2009 data from 593 US hospitals nationwide, we found that cesarean rates varied tenfold across hospitals, from 7.1 percent to 69.9 percent. Even for women with lower-risk pregnancies, in which more limited variation might be expected, cesarean rates varied fifteenfold, from 2.4 percent to 36.5 percent. Thus, vast differences in practice patterns are likely to be driving the costly overuse of cesarean delivery in many US hospitals. Because Medicaid pays for nearly half of US births, government efforts to decrease variation are warranted. We focus on four promising directions for reducing these variations, including better coordinating maternity care, collecting and measuring more data, tying Medicaid payment to quality improvement, and enhancing patient-centered decision making through public reporting.

摘要

剖宫产在美国是最常见的手术之一,而且剖宫产率正在上升。我们使用了全国 593 家美国医院 2009 年的数据,发现医院之间的剖宫产率差异高达十倍,从 7.1%到 69.9%。即使是对于低风险妊娠的女性,预期变化范围会更小,但剖宫产率也相差了十五倍,从 2.4%到 36.5%。因此,实践模式的巨大差异可能是导致许多美国医院过度使用剖宫产的原因。由于医疗补助计划为近一半的美国分娩提供了资金,政府有理由努力减少这种差异。我们关注了减少这些差异的四个有希望的方向,包括更好地协调产妇护理、收集和衡量更多的数据、将医疗补助支付与质量改进挂钩,以及通过公开报告增强以患者为中心的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/3615450/913829e4fe25/nihms445109f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/3615450/d25b6998cde3/nihms445109f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/3615450/913829e4fe25/nihms445109f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/3615450/d25b6998cde3/nihms445109f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/3615450/913829e4fe25/nihms445109f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.美国各医院的剖宫产率差异高达十倍;降低这种差异可能有助于解决质量和成本问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):527-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030.
2
Midwives and cesarean sections.助产士与剖宫产
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jun;32(6):1171. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0272.
3
Cesarean sections: the authors reply.剖宫产:作者回复。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jun;32(6):1171. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0273.
4
The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.非临床因素对再次剖宫产的影响。
JAMA. 1991 Jan 2;265(1):59-63.
5
Physician demand for leisure: implications for cesarean section rates.医生对休闲的需求:对剖宫产率的影响。
J Health Econ. 1996 Apr;15(2):233-42. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00039-9.
6
Econometric analysis of variation in cesarean section rates. A cross-sectional study of 59 obstetrical departments in Sweden.剖宫产率变化的计量经济学分析。瑞典59个产科部门的横断面研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):774-87. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300012071.
7
Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.医院层面上,行引产的初产妇行剖宫产的频率存在差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1179-1189. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004139.
8
Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.剖宫产术合理应用的地区差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):w355-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w355. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
9
The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.剖宫产与引产的关系。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):130-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01346.x.
10
Rethinking "woman's choice" of cesarean delivery.重新审视剖宫产的“产妇选择”
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1036-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1036.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy and Birth Trends Across Australia, the United States of America and the United Kingdom.澳大利亚、美利坚合众国和英国的妊娠与分娩趋势
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5841. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165841.
2
Can Birth Hospital Explain Racial/Ethnic Differences in Cesarean Birth Among Low-Risk Births? An Analysis of California Data, 2007-2018.分娩医院能否解释低风险分娩中剖宫产的种族/民族差异?对2007 - 2018年加利福尼亚州数据的分析
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02464-z.
3
Mapping maternity care deserts: Driving distance and health outcomes in North Carolina.

本文引用的文献

1
Births: preliminary data for 2011.出生情况:2011年初步数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012 Oct 3;61(5):1-18.
2
Maternity care and liability: pressing problems, substantive solutions.产妇保健与责任:亟待解决的问题,实质性的解决方案。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Jan;23(1):e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.11.001.
3
Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.
绘制产科护理荒漠地图:北卡罗来纳州的驾车距离与健康结果
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e70020. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70020.
4
Impact of an innovative case-based payment reform on hospital cost variation: insights from cerebral infarction inpatients in China.一项创新性病例付费改革对医院成本差异的影响:来自中国脑梗死住院患者的见解
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 19;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02447-w.
5
Meaningfulness, feasibility, and usability of quality-of-care measures for maternal and infant health: A structured mixed-methods review.母婴健康护理质量衡量指标的意义、可行性和可用性:一项结构化混合方法综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 18;9(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.681. eCollection 2025.
6
Assessing five-year trend and socio-demographic determinants of caesarean section delivery in Ghana.评估加纳剖宫产分娩的五年趋势及社会人口学决定因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07114-6.
7
Creating effective teams and valuing patient-centered care to change culture and improve equity on labor and delivery: a qualitative study.创建高效团队并重视以患者为中心的护理,以改变文化并改善分娩时的公平性:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):1645. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12108-3.
8
Variation in organisational factors across high- and low-performing hospitals with regard to spontaneous vaginal birth for Black women in four states: a cross-sectional descriptive study.四个州高绩效和低绩效医院在黑人女性自然分娩方面的组织因素差异:一项横断面描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 4;14(11):e082421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082421.
9
Role of Doulas in Improving Maternal Health and Health Equity Among Medicaid Enrollees, 2014‒2023.导乐在改善医疗补助参保者孕产妇健康及健康公平性方面的作用,2014 - 2023年
Am J Public Health. 2024 Nov;114(11):1275-1285. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307805.
10
Geographic Variation in Cesarean Sections in the United States: Trends, Correlates, and Other Interesting Facts.美国剖宫产的地区差异:趋势、相关因素及其他有趣事实。
J Labor Econ. 2024 Apr;42(Suppl 1):S219-S259. doi: 10.1086/728804.
预防首次剖宫产:尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国立儿童健康与人类发育研究所、母胎医学学会和美国妇产科学院联合研讨会总结。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1181-93. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182704880.
4
Addressing women's health needs and improving birth outcomes: results from a peer-to-peer state Medicaid learning project.满足妇女健康需求并改善分娩结局:一项州医疗补助同伴学习项目的成果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Aug;21:1-19.
5
Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world.全球剖宫产手术利用的不平等现象。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):331.e1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
6
Hospital volume, provider volume, and complications after childbirth in U.S. hospitals.美国医院的分娩量、提供者量和分娩后并发症。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):521-527. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822a65e4.
7
How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries.如何阻止剖宫产率的持续上升。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):199-200. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182266682.
8
The influence of hospital type on induction of labor and mode of delivery.医院类型对引产和分娩方式的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):346.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
9
Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.导致剖宫产率升高的指征。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65.
10
Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007.剖宫产率是否必然上升?1987 年至 2007 年工业化国家的趋势。
Birth. 2011 Jun;38(2):99-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.