Center for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine and Traumatology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the Swedish medical systems response to a mass casualty burn incident in a rural area with a focus on national coordination of burn care. Data were collected from two simulations of a mass casualty incident with burns in a rural area in the mid portion of Sweden close to the Norwegian border, based on a large inventory of emergency resources available in this area as well as regional hospitals, university hospitals and burn centres in Sweden and abroad. The simulation system Emergo Train System(®) (ETS) was used and risk for preventable death and complications were used as outcome measures: simulation I, 18.5% (n=13) preventable deaths and 15.5% (n=11) preventable complications; simulation II, 11.4% (n=8) preventable deaths and 11.4% (n=8) preventable complications. The last T1 patient was evacuated after 7h in simulation I, compared with 5h in simulation II. Better national coordination of burn care and more timely distribution based on the experience from the first simulation, and possibly a learning effect, led to a better patient outcome in simulation II. The experience using a system that combines both process and outcome indicators can create important results that may support disaster planning.
本研究旨在评估瑞典医疗体系对农村地区大规模伤亡烧伤事件的应对情况,重点关注烧伤救治的国家协调。研究数据来自于瑞典中南部靠近挪威边境的一个农村地区的两次大规模伤亡烧伤事件模拟,该地区的应急资源以及瑞典国内外的区域医院、大学医院和烧伤中心都有大量的储备。模拟系统采用了 Emergo Train System(®)(ETS),并将可预防的死亡和并发症风险作为评估结果的指标:模拟 I 中,可预防的死亡人数占 18.5%(n=13),可预防的并发症人数占 15.5%(n=11);模拟 II 中,可预防的死亡人数占 11.4%(n=8),可预防的并发症人数占 11.4%(n=8)。模拟 I 中最后一名 T1 患者在 7 小时后被疏散,而在模拟 II 中则在 5 小时后。基于第一次模拟的经验,烧伤救治的国家协调得到了更好的改善,并且分配更加及时,可能还存在学习效应,这使得模拟 II 中的患者结果得到了改善。使用结合了过程和结果指标的系统的经验可以产生重要的结果,这些结果可能支持灾难规划。