Suppr超能文献

有上腹部手术史患者的腹腔镜胃切除术:配对分析结果

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery: results of a matched-pair analysis.

作者信息

Tsunoda Shigeru, Okabe Hiroshi, Obama Kazutaka, Tanaka Eiji, Akagami Masatoshi, Kinjo Yousuke, Sakai Yoshiharu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2014 Feb;44(2):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0533-5. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for patients who have undergone previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) remain unclear. A matched-pair analysis was conducted to compare the short-term outcomes of LG between patients with gastric cancer who had undergone PUAS and those who had not.

METHODS

A matched-pair analysis was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of LG between 22 patients who had undergone PUAS and 66 who had not (control group). To compare the outcome to that of open gastrectomy (OG) following PUAS, a total of 143 consecutive OG patients treated during the same study period were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Cholecystectomy was the most common type of PUAS, followed by gastrectomy. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the length of the operation, blood loss, and the number of retrieved lymph nodes or the rate of conversion to open surgery. The postoperative morbidity in the PUAS group (3/22, 13.6 %) was comparable to that of the control group (7/66, 10.6 %, P = 0.6981). There was no mortality within 30 days in either group. When compared to OG following PUAS (n = 23), LG was performed with significantly less blood loss with an equivalent postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

LG following PUAS is considered to be a safe and feasible surgical modality. PUAS should therefore not be regarded as a contraindication for LG.

摘要

目的

对于曾接受过上腹部手术(PUAS)的患者,腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)的安全性和可行性仍不明确。进行配对分析以比较曾接受PUAS的胃癌患者与未接受过PUAS的胃癌患者行LG后的短期结局。

方法

进行配对分析,比较22例曾接受PUAS的患者与66例未接受过PUAS的患者(对照组)行LG后的短期结局。为了将该结局与PUAS后开腹胃切除术(OG)的结局进行比较,还回顾了在同一研究期间接受治疗的143例连续OG患者。

结果

胆囊切除术是最常见的PUAS类型,其次是胃切除术。两组在手术时长、失血量、获取的淋巴结数量或转为开放手术的比例方面无显著差异。PUAS组的术后发病率(3/22,13.6%)与对照组(7/66,10.6%,P = 0.6981)相当。两组均无30天内死亡病例。与PUAS后的OG(n = 23)相比,LG的失血量明显更少,术后结局相当。

结论

PUAS后的LG被认为是一种安全可行的手术方式。因此,PUAS不应被视为LG的禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验