Li Anthony, Behr Elijah R
Cardiovascular Sciences Research Centre, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Future Cardiol. 2013 Mar;9(2):253-71. doi: 10.2217/fca.12.82.
More than 20 years have passed since the description of Brugada syndrome as a clinical entity. The original case series depicted patients who all had coved ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads, associated with a high risk of sudden death and no apparent structural heart disease. As subsequent registry data were published, it became apparent that the spectrum of risk is wide, with the majority of patients classified as low risk. Two consensus documents have been published that will continue to be updated. Despite intense research efforts, many controversies still exist over its pathophysiology and the risk stratification for sudden death. Management continues to be challenging with a lack of drug therapy and high complication rates from implantable cardioverter defibrillators. In this review, we highlight the current state-of-the-art therapies and their controversies.
自 Brugada 综合征作为一种临床实体被描述以来,已经过去了 20 多年。最初的病例系列描述了所有右胸前导联出现穹窿型 ST 段抬高的患者,这些患者伴有猝死的高风险且无明显的结构性心脏病。随着后续登记数据的公布,很明显风险范围很广,大多数患者被归类为低风险。已经发表了两份共识文件,并将继续更新。尽管进行了深入的研究,但在其病理生理学和猝死风险分层方面仍存在许多争议。由于缺乏药物治疗以及植入式心脏复律除颤器的高并发症发生率,管理仍然具有挑战性。在本综述中,我们重点介绍了当前的先进疗法及其争议。