World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb 21;19(7):968-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.968.
Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is traditionally based on several drugs, including salicylates, corticosteroids, and antibiotics; in addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has considerably evolved with the advent of newer, effective therapeutic measures (such as the biological agents) that are able to improve in a considerable manner both the clinical and endoscopic variables. Thus, mucosal healing, at least considered from an endoscopic point of view, is today regarded as the ultimate endpoint for treatment of these conditions. However, it is also increasingly clear that endoscopic healing is not necessarily paralleled by histological healing; There are few doubts that the latter should be considered as a true, objective healing and the ultimate goal to reach when treating patients with IBD. Unfortunately, and surprisingly, only a few, incomplete, and somewhat conflicting data exist on this topic, especially because there is still the need to standardize both histological assessment and the severity grading of these disorders; Issues that have not been yet been resolved for clinical practice and therapeutic trials. Hopefully, with the help of an increased awareness on the clinical researchers' side, and the availability of dedicated pathologists on the other side, this matter will be effectively faced and resolved in the near future.
炎症性肠病(IBD)的传统治疗方法基于几种药物,包括柳氮磺胺吡啶、皮质类固醇和抗生素;此外,随着新型有效治疗方法(如生物制剂)的出现,治疗手段有了相当大的发展,这些方法能够显著改善临床和内镜变量。因此,黏膜愈合,至少从内镜角度来看,今天被认为是这些疾病治疗的最终目标。然而,越来越明显的是,内镜愈合不一定与组织学愈合平行;几乎毫无疑问,后者应被视为真正的、客观的愈合,是治疗 IBD 患者时应达到的最终目标。不幸的是,令人惊讶的是,关于这个主题只有很少、不完整且有些相互矛盾的数据,尤其是因为仍然需要对组织学评估和这些疾病的严重程度分级进行标准化;这些问题尚未在临床实践和治疗试验中得到解决。希望随着临床研究人员认识的提高,以及专门病理学家的可用性,这个问题将在不久的将来得到有效解决。