INSERM, UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Sep;24(9):2455-60. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2316-7. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
We investigated the association of trabecular bone score (TBS) with microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of human lumbar vertebrae. We found that TBS reflects vertebral trabecular microarchitecture and is an independent predictor of vertebral mechanics. However, the addition of TBS to areal BMD (aBMD) did not significantly improve prediction of vertebral strength.
The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a gray-level measure of texture using a modified experimental variogram which can be extracted from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images. The current study aimed to confirm whether TBS is associated with trabecular microarchitecture and mechanics of human lumbar vertebrae, and if its combination with BMD improves prediction of fracture risk.
Lumbar vertebrae (L3) were harvested fresh from 16 donors. The anteroposterior and lateral bone mineral content (BMC) and areal BMD (aBMD) of the vertebral body were measured using DXA; then, the TBS was extracted using TBS iNsight software (Medimaps SA, France). The trabecular bone volume (Tb.BV/tissue volume, TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), degree of anisotropy, and structure model index (SMI) were measured using microcomputed tomography. Quasi-static uniaxial compressive testing was performed on L3 vertebral bodies to assess failure load and stiffness.
The TBS was significantly correlated to Tb.BV/TV and SMI (r = 0.58 and -0.62; p = 0.02, 0.01), but not related to BMC and BMD. TBS was significantly correlated with stiffness (r = 0.64; p = 0.007), independently of bone mass. Using stepwise multiple regression models, we failed to demonstrate that the combination of BMD and TBS was better at explaining mechanical behavior than either variable alone. However, the combination TBS, Tb.Th, and BMC did perform better than each parameter alone, explaining 79% of the variability in stiffness.
In our study, TBS was associated with microarchitecture parameters and with vertebral mechanical behavior, but TBS did not improve prediction of vertebral biomechanical properties in addition to aBMD.
本研究旨在证实 TBS 是否与人类腰椎的小梁微观结构和力学特性相关,以及其与骨密度(BMD)的联合应用是否能改善骨折风险的预测。
从 16 名供体中新鲜采集腰椎(L3)。使用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)测量椎体的前后和侧位骨矿物质含量(BMC)和面积骨密度(aBMD);然后使用 TBS iNsight 软件(法国 Medimaps SA)提取 TBS。使用微计算机断层扫描测量小梁骨体积(Tb.BV/组织体积,TV)、小梁厚度(Tb.Th)、各向异性程度和结构模型指数(SMI)。对 L3 椎体进行准静态单轴压缩试验,以评估失效载荷和刚度。
TBS 与 Tb.BV/TV 和 SMI 显著相关(r=0.58 和-0.62;p=0.02,0.01),但与 BMC 和 BMD 无关。TBS 与刚度显著相关(r=0.64;p=0.007),与骨量独立相关。使用逐步多元回归模型,我们未能证明 BMD 和 TBS 的联合应用在解释力学行为方面优于任何单一变量。然而,TBS、Tb.Th 和 BMC 的联合应用比单独使用任何参数都要好,能更好地解释刚度的 79%变异性。
在我们的研究中,TBS 与微观结构参数和椎体力学特性相关,但 TBS 并不能在 aBMD 之外改善对椎体生物力学特性的预测。