• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用罗布森分类系统研究加拿大的剖宫产率。

Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.

作者信息

Kelly Sherrie, Sprague Ann, Fell Deshayne B, Murphy Phil, Aelicks Nancy, Guo Yanfang, Fahey John, Lauzon Leeanne, Scott Heather, Lee Lily, Kinniburgh Brooke, Prince Monica, Walker Mark

机构信息

Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa ON; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa ON.

Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Perinatal Program, St. John's NL.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0.

DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0
PMID:23470108
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the groups within the obstetric population contributing most substantially to the Caesarean section rate in five Canadian provinces.

METHODS

Hospital births from five participating provinces were grouped into Robson's 10 mutually exclusive and totally inclusive classification categories. The relative contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, relative size of group, and CS rate were calculated for British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador for the four-year period from 2007-2008 to 2010-2011.

RESULTS

In all five provinces (accounting for approximately 64% of births in Canada), and for all years examined, the group making the largest relative contribution to the CS rate was women with at least one previous CS and a term, singleton, cephalic-presenting pregnancy (Robson Group 5). The CS rate for this group ranged from 76.1% in Alberta to 89.9% in Newfoundland and Labrador in 2010 to 2011, accounting for 11.3% of all deliveries. The rate of CS for Group 5 decreased slightly over the four years, except in Ontario. The next largest contributing group was nulliparous women with a term, singleton, cephalic-presenting pregnancy. Those with induced labour or Caesarean section before labour (Robson Group 2) had CS rates ranging from 34.4% in Nova Scotia to 44.6% in British Columbia (accounting for 13.1% of all deliveries), and those with spontaneous onset of labour (Robson Group 1) had CS rates of 14.5% to 20.3% in 2010 to 2011 (accounting for 23.6% of all deliveries).

CONCLUSION

All hospitals and health authorities can use this standardized classification system as part of a quality improvement initiative to monitor Caesarean section rates. This classification system identifies relevant areas for interventions and resources to reduce rates of Caesarean section.

摘要

目的

确定加拿大五个省份产科人群中对剖宫产率贡献最大的群体。

方法

来自五个参与省份的医院分娩病例被归入罗布森的10个相互排斥且完全涵盖的分类类别中。计算了2007 - 2008年至2010 - 2011年这四年间,不列颠哥伦比亚省、艾伯塔省、安大略省、新斯科舍省以及纽芬兰与拉布拉多省中,每个群体对总体剖宫产率的相对贡献、群体相对规模以及剖宫产率。

结果

在所有五个省份(约占加拿大分娩总数的64%)以及所考察的所有年份中,对剖宫产率相对贡献最大的群体是有至少一次既往剖宫产史且此次为足月、单胎、头先露妊娠的女性(罗布森第5组)。该组的剖宫产率在2010至2011年间,从艾伯塔省的76.1%到纽芬兰与拉布拉多省的89.9%不等,占所有分娩的11.3%。除安大略省外,第5组的剖宫产率在这四年间略有下降。其次贡献最大的群体是足月、单胎、头先露妊娠的初产妇。那些引产或临产前剖宫产的产妇(罗布森第2组)的剖宫产率在新斯科舍省为34.4%,在不列颠哥伦比亚省为44.6%(占所有分娩的13.1%),而自然临产的产妇(罗布森第1组)在2010至2011年的剖宫产率为14.5%至20.3%(占所有分娩的23.6%)。

结论

所有医院和卫生当局均可将此标准化分类系统用作质量改进举措的一部分,以监测剖宫产率。该分类系统确定了降低剖宫产率的干预措施和资源的相关领域。

相似文献

1
Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.使用罗布森分类系统研究加拿大的剖宫产率。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0.
2
Reporting Caesarean Delivery in Quebec Using the Robson Classification System.使用罗布森分类系统报告魁北克的剖宫产情况。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Mar;39(3):152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.010.
3
Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital.在特里布万大学教学医院使用罗布森分类系统检查分层剖宫产率。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013 Sep;11(25):255-8.
4
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.剖宫产率:在澳大利亚一所三级医院应用改良的 Robson 十组分类法。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
Examining Cesarean Section Rates in Canada Using the Modified Robson Classification.运用改良 Robson 分类法考察加拿大的剖宫产率。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Jun;42(6):757-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
6
Applying the Robson classification to routine facility data to understand the Caesarean section practice in conflict settings of South Kivu, eastern DR Congo.运用 Robson 分类法对常规设施数据进行分析,以了解刚果民主共和国东部南基伍省冲突地区的剖宫产实践情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0237450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237450. eCollection 2020.
7
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.项目适宜分娩和剖宫产率降低:应用罗伯逊分类系统进行的分析。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.剖宫产的罗布森分类:对尼日利亚一家私立三级医院降低剖宫产率的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05557-x.
9
Contribution of select maternal groups to temporal trends in rates of caesarean section.特定产妇群体对剖宫产率时间趋势的贡献。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jul;32(7):633-41. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34566-2.
10
Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.巴勒斯坦剖宫产采用罗布森十组分类系统:一项基于人群的出生队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e022875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmarking Cesarean Section Trends: A Case Study from Tu Du Hospital Using Robson's Model.剖宫产趋势的基准研究:以图德医院为例,采用罗布森模型进行的案例分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;13(16):2070. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162070.
2
Pregnancy after amputation: A national survey of prosthetic and mobility outcomes in women with lived experience.截肢后妊娠:对有实际经历的女性的假肢与活动能力结果的全国性调查。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2025 Apr 1;49(2):179-184. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000407. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Investigating the implementation of a Trial of Labour After Caesarean (TOLAC) delivery bundle with respect to decreasing caesarean delivery rates: a multisite quality improvement initiative.
调查剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)方案在降低剖宫产率方面的实施情况:一项多中心质量改进计划。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088734.
4
An Analysis of Caesarean Sections in a Community Cottage Hospital in Nigeria's Niger Delta Using The Robson Classification.使用罗布森分类法对尼日利亚尼日尔三角洲一家社区乡村医院剖宫产情况的分析
Niger Med J. 2022 Sep 11;63(2):91-97. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
5
Humanizing Birth in a Third-Level Hospital: Revealing the Benefits of Natural Cesarean Sections.三级医院中的人性化分娩:揭示自然剖宫产的益处
Life (Basel). 2024 Mar 17;14(3):397. doi: 10.3390/life14030397.
6
Factors Associated with High Rates of Caesarean Deliveries: A Cross Sectional Study Classifying Deliveries According to Robson in Mengo Hospital Kampala.剖宫产高发生率相关因素:一项在坎帕拉蒙戈医院按照罗布森分类法对分娩进行分类的横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov 8;16:2339-2356. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S422705. eCollection 2023.
7
An Analysis of the Mode of Delivery, Risk Factors, and Subgroups with High Caesarean Birth Rates Using Robson Classification System.应用罗伯逊分类系统分析分娩方式、危险因素和剖宫产率较高的亚组。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Apr;28(4):667-678. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03783-5. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
8
Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review.按罗布森十组分类系统分类的剖宫产频率:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41091. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Implementation of the Robson Classification in Greece: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.希腊Robson分类法的实施:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;11(6):908. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060908.
10
Leadership Driven Persistent Reduction in Cesarean Trends: An Interventional Study for Quality Improvement.领导力驱动剖宫产趋势持续下降:一项质量改进的干预性研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Feb;73(1):36-43. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01710-2. Epub 2022 Sep 17.