• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按罗布森十组分类系统分类的剖宫产频率:一项范围综述

Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Jiandani Farah, Somalwar Savita, Bhalerao Anuja

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Nagpur, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41091. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.41091
PMID:37519485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10378715/
Abstract

The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) is rising rapidly. However, it should be carried out only under valid obstetric indications due to the various complications associated with it. Therefore, to record CS incidences, Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) was implemented. This review focuses on the prevalence of CS rates found in various studies and identifies the clinically important groups that were most involved in CS deliveries. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed in this review. "Caesarean delivery" OR "Robson's Ten Group" OR "Classification System" were keywords used to search literature. Twenty-one studies were included in this review based on eligibility criteria. We concluded that group 5 was the major contributing factor for the increase in CS rates followed by group 10, group 4, group 2, and group 1. Previous CS was the most common factor responsible for increasing CS rates. We emphasize that Robson's TGCS is an essential parameter for recording CS rates and is simple to use for CS rate comparison.

摘要

剖宫产(CS)的发生率正在迅速上升。然而,由于其相关的各种并发症,仅应在有效的产科指征下进行剖宫产。因此,为了记录剖宫产发生率,实施了罗布森十组分类系统(TGCS)。本综述重点关注各项研究中发现的剖宫产率,并确定剖宫产分娩中涉及最多的临床重要组。本综述遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)指南。“剖宫产分娩”、“罗布森十组”或“分类系统”是用于检索文献的关键词。根据纳入标准,本综述纳入了21项研究。我们得出结论,第5组是剖宫产率上升的主要促成因素,其次是第10组、第4组、第2组和第1组。既往剖宫产是导致剖宫产率上升的最常见因素。我们强调,罗布森TGCS是记录剖宫产率的重要参数,并且易于用于剖宫产率比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c9a/10378715/c6ba83386793/cureus-0015-00000041091-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c9a/10378715/c6ba83386793/cureus-0015-00000041091-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c9a/10378715/c6ba83386793/cureus-0015-00000041091-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review.按罗布森十组分类系统分类的剖宫产频率:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41091. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.在曼尼普尔邦的一家三级护理医院,使用罗布森分类法分析剖宫产率及其指征。
Indian J Public Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):434-438. doi: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1928_21.
3
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.使用罗布森十组分类法检查剖宫产率
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Robson's Group 2 Criteria among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.罗森 2 组标准在一家三级保健医院中的剖宫产率:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Nov 15;59(243):1098-1101. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7138.
5
Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.利用罗伯逊的十分组分类系统和其他社会人口学及临床变量对 CS 率进行医院间比较的风险调整模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jun 21;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-54.
6
Cesarean Audit Using Robson Classification at a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar: A Retrospective Study.在比哈尔邦一家三级医疗中心使用罗布森分类法进行剖宫产审计:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 13;14(3):e23133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23133. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.使用 Robson 的十组分类系统比较欧洲的剖宫产率:来自 Euro-Peristat 研究的常规数据分析。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1444-1453. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16634. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.使用罗布森十组分类系统对剖宫产进行分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823.
9
Analysis and trends of caesarean sections using Robson's classification over 7-year period at a rural teaching hospital.一家农村教学医院7年间使用罗布森分类法对剖宫产情况的分析与趋势
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Dec;13(12):5550-5554. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
10
Segregation of Patients for Intrapartum Monitoring, using Robson's Classification.采用罗布森分类法对产时监测患者进行分类。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):QC15-QC18. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23115.9672. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study.既往有一次剖宫产史且无阴道分娩史的产妇在试产期间的妊娠间隔与子宫破裂:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 21;80:103071. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Cesarean section in Suriname using robson classification: a two-year nationwide cross-sectional study on rates, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of cesarean section.苏里南剖宫产的罗布森分类法:一项关于剖宫产率、危险因素及围产期结局的为期两年的全国性横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07009-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Time trends in caesarean section rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health: a population-based cohort study of 1 153 789 births in Norway.剖宫产率的时间趋势及其与围产儿和新生儿健康的关系:挪威 1153789 例出生的基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 1;13(2):e069562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069562.
2
Cesarean Audit Using Robson Classification at a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar: A Retrospective Study.在比哈尔邦一家三级医疗中心使用罗布森分类法进行剖宫产审计:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 13;14(3):e23133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23133. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Cesarean section rate changes after audit and feedback with the Ten Group Classification System in a French perinatal network: A retrospective pre-post study.
How and why does mode of birth affect processes for routine data collection and use? A qualitative study in Bangladesh and Tanzania.
出生方式如何以及为何会影响常规数据收集和使用的流程?在孟加拉国和坦桑尼亚进行的一项定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;4(12):e0003808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003808. eCollection 2024.
4
Factors Affecting Elective and Non-elective Cesarean Sections: A Multinomial Regression Analysis Using Robson's Classification in a Southeast European Country.影响选择性剖宫产和非选择性剖宫产的因素:在一个东南欧国家使用罗布森分类法进行的多项回归分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 10;16(6):e62038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62038. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Optimizing caesarean section use and feasibility of implementing the Robson classification system: Perspectives of healthcare providers and policymakers.优化剖宫产的使用及实施罗布森分类系统的可行性:医疗服务提供者和政策制定者的观点
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Mar 25;12:20503121241237447. doi: 10.1177/20503121241237447. eCollection 2024.
法国围产医学网络应用“十组分类系统”实施审核反馈后剖宫产率的变化:一项回顾性前后对照研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Apr;101(4):388-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14327. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
4
Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.采用改良 Robson 十组分类系统调查罗马尼亚未成年母亲剖宫产术实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010727.
5
Trends in cesarean section rates in private and public facilities in rural eastern Maharashtra, India from 2010-2017.印度马哈拉施特拉邦东部农村地区 2010-2017 年私立和公立医疗机构剖宫产率趋势。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256096. eCollection 2021.
6
Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.使用罗布森十组分类系统对剖宫产进行分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823.
7
Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.使用 Robson 的十组分类系统比较欧洲的剖宫产率:来自 Euro-Peristat 研究的常规数据分析。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1444-1453. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16634. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
9
A 10 year comparative study of caesarean deliveries using the Robson 10 group classification system in a university hospital in Austria.一项在奥地利一所大学医院使用 Robson 10 组分类系统进行的 10 年剖宫产比较研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0240475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240475. eCollection 2020.
10
Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data.通过 Robson 分类改善剖宫产决策:基于 5323500 例活产数据的一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Aug 17;86(1):101. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2615.