Suppr超能文献

[两种不同预后评分在腹膜炎患者中的价值。曼海姆腹膜炎指数与急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II]

[The value of 2 distinct prognosis scores in patients with peritonitis. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index versus the Apache II score].

作者信息

Rogy M, Függer R, Schemper M, Koss G, Schulz F

机构信息

I. Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Wien.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1990 Apr;61(4):297-300.

PMID:2347264
Abstract

Seventy patients suffering from purulent peritonitis entered this study, 31 of them were taken in prospectively, to contrast two different prognostic scores, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) vs. the Apache II (APS II). The MPI is shown as a prognostic index for peritonitis with high accuracy in individual prognosis. The simultaneous use of both scores, the MPI as well as the APS II, leads to a negligible improvement of prognostic accuracy. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity with the MPI are of higher accuracy than calculated with the APS II.

摘要

70例化脓性腹膜炎患者进入本研究,其中31例为前瞻性纳入,以对比两种不同的预后评分,即曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)与急性生理和慢性健康状况评分系统II(APS II)。MPI作为腹膜炎的预后指标,在个体预后方面具有较高的准确性。同时使用这两种评分,即MPI和APS II,对预后准确性的提高微不足道。此外,MPI的敏感性和特异性比APS II计算得出的准确性更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验