Liu H-M, Wong H-F, Lee K-W, Tu Y-K, Yeh Y-S, Chou C-W, Wang Y-H, Chen Y-L, Lo Y-L, Hsieh T-C, Wang Y-C, Lin T-K, Lai D-M, Chen W-L, Tseng H-M, Li C-W
Departments of Medical Imaging and Radiology, Hospital & College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;19(1):35-42. doi: 10.1177/159101991301900105. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
We compared the outcomes of endovascular coiling with microsurgical clipping of aneurysms in a Taiwanese population. In an ambi-directional cohort design, patient baseline characteristics and clinical course after treatment for ruptured subarachnoid aneurysm were abstracted from medical records from three hospitals to examine and compare differences in post-operative outcomes between those treated with endovascular coiling and those treated with microsurgical clipping. Outcomes were measured, using the modified Rankin scale, two months, one year and two years postoperatively. Of the 642 patients enrolled in the study, 281 underwent endovascular treatment and 361 underwent neurosurgery. The demographics and baseline characteristics of two groups were comparable except for a larger maximum target aneurysm lumen size (p=0.02) in the endovascular group. Patients who underwent the endovascular procedure tended to have a better quality of life than those who had neurosurgery (p<0.01). When the severity of symptom data was pooled into two groups (Rankin values 0-2 and 3-6) a statistically significant relationship was found between the severity of symptoms and age, Hunt and Hess grade, number of target aneurysms detected, and log of maximum target aneurysm lumen size (all p≤0.01). After controlling for potential confounding factors and using the lumped Rankin outcome data, no significant difference in outcome was found between the two procedures at either time point. Our study indicated that endovascular coiling achieves results comparable to surgical clipping for patients with ruptured subarachnoid aneurysms in a Taiwanese population.
我们比较了台湾人群中动脉瘤血管内栓塞与显微手术夹闭的治疗效果。在双向队列设计中,从三家医院的病历中提取破裂性蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤患者的基线特征和治疗后的临床病程,以检查和比较血管内栓塞治疗与显微手术夹闭治疗患者术后结果的差异。使用改良Rankin量表在术后两个月、一年和两年测量结果。在纳入研究的642例患者中,281例接受了血管内治疗,361例接受了神经外科手术。除血管内治疗组的最大目标动脉瘤管腔尺寸较大外(p = 0.02),两组的人口统计学和基线特征具有可比性。接受血管内治疗的患者往往比接受神经外科手术的患者生活质量更好(p < 0.01)。当将症状严重程度数据汇总为两组(Rankin值0 - 2和3 - 6)时,发现症状严重程度与年龄、Hunt和Hess分级、检测到的目标动脉瘤数量以及最大目标动脉瘤管腔尺寸的对数之间存在统计学显著关系(所有p≤0.01)。在控制潜在混杂因素并使用汇总的Rankin结局数据后,两个时间点的两种手术在结局上均未发现显著差异。我们的研究表明,对于台湾人群中破裂性蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤患者,血管内栓塞的治疗效果与手术夹闭相当。