Suppr超能文献

土耳其关于脑损伤的误解。

Misconceptions about brain injury in Turkey.

作者信息

Maviş Ilknur, Akyıldız Didem

机构信息

Anadolu University, Center for Speech and Language Disorders, Eskişehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2013;27(5):587-95. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.772236. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to provide information about the knowledge and beliefs that people have regarding brain injury and to examine if the misbeliefs of adults in Turkey are similar to the misconceptions previously reported in the US and UK.

METHODS AND PROCEDURE

Two hundred and fifty-three respondents answered questions about general brain injury knowledge, coma and unconsciousness, memory deficits and brain injury recovery in a questionnaire. Chi-square analyses revealed significant differences based on age, education and gender. Significant differences were determined between Turkish and US participants and Turkish and UK participants by Student t-test analysis. Findings were compared with those reported by previous researchers from the UK and US who administered the same questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

A close examination of the survey makes it clear that the percentages for the 'general knowledge on BI' were found to be higher. Participants' levels of accurate information on coma and unconsciousness and memory deficits ranked secondly and thirdly, respectively. The recovery process paled in significance, as it did not feature very highly.

CONCLUSIONS

The general public should be informed about the seriousness and pervasiveness of the problems related to consequences of BI before taking decisions concerning language or cognitive therapies for their victims. Healthcare professionals should take roles in advocating reliable publicity primarily by dispelling misconceptions about BI.

摘要

主要目标

本研究的目的是提供有关人们对脑损伤的认识和信念的信息,并检验土耳其成年人的错误观念是否与美国和英国先前报道的误解相似。

方法与过程

253名受访者在一份问卷中回答了有关一般脑损伤知识、昏迷与无意识、记忆缺陷以及脑损伤恢复的问题。卡方分析显示,基于年龄、教育程度和性别存在显著差异。通过学生t检验分析确定了土耳其与美国参与者以及土耳其与英国参与者之间的显著差异。研究结果与之前来自英国和美国使用相同问卷的研究人员所报告的结果进行了比较。

主要结果

对调查的仔细审查表明,“脑损伤一般知识”的百分比更高。参与者关于昏迷与无意识以及记忆缺陷的准确信息水平分别排在第二和第三位。恢复过程的重要性相对较低,因为它没有占据很高的比重。

结论

在就脑损伤受害者的语言或认知疗法做出决策之前,应向公众告知与脑损伤后果相关问题的严重性和普遍性。医疗保健专业人员应主要通过消除对脑损伤的误解来倡导可靠的宣传。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验