Suppr超能文献

比较质子治疗与光子治疗时的生物学考虑。

Biological considerations when comparing proton therapy with photon therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013 Apr;23(2):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2012.11.002.

Abstract

Owing to the limited availability of data on the outcome of proton therapy, treatments are generally optimized based on broadly available data on photon-based treatments. However, the microscopic pattern of energy deposition of protons differs from that of photons, leading to a different biological effect. Consequently, proton therapy needs a correction factor (relative biological effectiveness) to relate proton doses to photon doses, and currently, a generic value is used. Moreover, the macroscopic distribution of dose in proton therapy differs compared with photon treatments. Although this may offer new opportunities to reduce dose to normal tissues, it raises the question whether data obtained from photon-based treatments offer sufficient information on dose-volume effects to optimally use unique features of protons. In addition, there are potential differences in late effects due to low doses of secondary radiation outside the volume irradiated by the primary beam. This article discusses the controversies associated with these 3 issues when comparing proton and photon therapy.

摘要

由于质子治疗结果的数据有限,治疗通常基于广泛可用的光子治疗数据进行优化。然而,质子的能量沉积微观模式与光子不同,导致不同的生物学效应。因此,质子治疗需要一个校正因子(相对生物学效应)将质子剂量与光子剂量联系起来,目前使用的是通用值。此外,质子治疗中的剂量宏观分布与光子治疗不同。尽管这可能为降低正常组织的剂量提供新的机会,但这就提出了一个问题,即从光子治疗中获得的数据是否提供了足够的剂量-体积效应信息,以充分利用质子的独特特性。此外,由于初级射束照射体积外的次级辐射的低剂量,可能存在晚期效应的差异。本文讨论了在比较质子和光子治疗时与这 3 个问题相关的争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验