Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 May;51(6):1094-102. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
There is great interest in the development of cognitive markers that differentiate "normal" age-associated cognitive change from that of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in its prodromal (i.e., mild cognitive impairment; MCI) or even preclinical stages. Dual process models posit that recognition memory is supported by the dissociable processes of recollection and familiarity. Familiarity-based memory has generally been considered to be spared during normal aging, but it remains controversial whether this type of memory is impaired in early AD. Here, we describe findings of estimates of recollection and familiarity in young adults (YA), cognitively normal older adults (CN), and patients with amnestic-MCI (a-MCI). These measures in the CN and a-MCI patients were then related to a structural imaging biomarker of AD that has previously been demonstrated to be sensitive to preclinical and prodromal AD, the Cortical Signature of AD (ADsig). Consistent with much work in the literature, recollection, but not familiarity, was impaired in CN versus YA. Replicating our prior findings, a-MCI patients displayed impairment in both familiarity and recollection. Finally, the familiarity measure was correlated with the ADsig biomarker across the CN and a-MCI group, as well as within the CN adults alone. No other standard psychometric measure was as highly associated with the ADsig, suggesting that familiarity may be a sensitive biomarker of AD-specific brain changes in preclinical and prodromal AD and that it may offer a qualitatively distinct measure of early AD memory impairment relative to normal age-associated change.
人们对开发认知标志物非常感兴趣,这些标志物可以区分“正常”与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的认知变化,包括前驱期(即轻度认知障碍;MCI)甚至临床前阶段。双加工模型假设,再认记忆是由可分离的再认和熟悉过程支持的。熟悉记忆通常被认为在正常衰老过程中不受影响,但在早期 AD 中是否存在这种类型的记忆损伤仍存在争议。在这里,我们描述了对年轻成年人(YA)、认知正常的老年人(CN)和遗忘型 MCI(a-MCI)患者的再认和熟悉度的估计结果。然后,将这些 CN 和 a-MCI 患者的测量结果与以前证明对临床前和前驱 AD 敏感的 AD 结构成像生物标志物——AD 皮质标志物(ADsig)进行了关联。与文献中的大量工作一致,CN 与 YA 相比,再认受损,但熟悉度没有受损。与我们之前的发现一致,a-MCI 患者的熟悉度和再认度均受损。最后,熟悉度测量值与 CN 和 a-MCI 组以及 CN 成人组内的 ADsig 生物标志物相关。没有其他标准心理测量指标与 ADsig 高度相关,这表明熟悉度可能是前驱期和临床前 AD 中 AD 特异性脑变化的敏感生物标志物,并且它可能提供一种与正常年龄相关变化相比,对早期 AD 记忆损伤具有定性不同的衡量标准。