• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肘部尺神经病变单纯减压术后最小临床重要差异

The minimal clinically important difference after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

作者信息

Malay Sunitha, Chung Kevin C

机构信息

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5340, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Apr;38(4):652-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.022
PMID:23474160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3617491/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Establishing minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported outcomes questionnaires is an important component of outcomes research to understand treatment effectiveness from the patient's perspective. For patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), these assessments are vital to examine how much change in the questionnaire scores equate to patient satisfaction.

METHODS

We calculated the change in scores of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (CTQ) from preoperative to 3, 6, and 12 months after ulnar nerve simple decompression procedure. We used the anchor-based approach of receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the MCID.

RESULTS

On average, MCID of 10, 12, and 7 points were identified for pain, function, and activities of daily living domains of the MHQ. Similarly, DASH, CTQ-symptom severity scale, and CTQ-function severity scale had an average MCID of 7, 0.7, and 0.3, points respectively. At the 3, 6, and 12 months' time points, an MCID of 9, 8, and 13 points for pain; 12, 12, and 12 points for function; and 6, 8, and 6 points for activities of daily living domains of the MHQ were identified; similarly an MCID of 8, 7, and 7 points for DASH; 0.4, 0.7, and 0.7 points for CTQ-symptom severity scale; and 0.3, 0.3, and 0.4 points for CTQ-function severity scale were established.

CONCLUSIONS

The smaller MCIDs of MHQ, DASH, and even smaller MCIDs of CTQ found in our study indicate that a small change in the scores identified satisfied patients. Simple decompression surgery for UNE produced patient satisfaction with only a small change in their questionnaire scores. The implications of this finding are that simple decompression surgery for UNE is a highly effective procedure and that the outcomes questionnaires used are highly responsive, which minimizes sample size requirements for future research studies relating to UNE.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

摘要

目的

确定患者报告结局问卷的最小临床重要差异(MCID)是结局研究的重要组成部分,有助于从患者角度理解治疗效果。对于肘部尺神经病变(UNE)患者,这些评估对于检验问卷分数的变化与患者满意度之间的关系至关重要。

方法

我们计算了尺神经单纯减压术后3个月、6个月和12个月时,密歇根手部结局问卷(MHQ)、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷以及腕管综合征问卷(CTQ)的术前至术后分数变化。我们采用基于锚点的受试者工作特征曲线方法来确定MCID。

结果

平均而言,MHQ的疼痛、功能和日常生活活动领域的MCID分别为10分、12分和7分。同样,DASH、CTQ症状严重程度量表和CTQ功能严重程度量表的平均MCID分别为7分、0.7分和0.3分。在3个月、6个月和12个月的时间点,MHQ的疼痛、功能和日常生活活动领域的MCID分别为9分、8分和13分;功能分别为12分、12分和12分;日常生活活动领域分别为6分、8分和6分;同样,DASH的MCID分别为8分、7分和7分;CTQ症状严重程度量表分别为0.4分、0.7分和0.7分;CTQ功能严重程度量表分别为0.3分、0.3分和0.4分。

结论

我们的研究发现,MHQ和DASH的MCID较小,CTQ的MCID更小,这表明分数的微小变化就能使患者满意。UNE的单纯减压手术仅使问卷分数有微小变化,却能让患者满意。这一发现的意义在于,UNE的单纯减压手术是一种高效的手术,所使用的结局问卷具有高度敏感性,这将减少未来UNE相关研究的样本量需求。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性研究II级。

相似文献

1
The minimal clinically important difference after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.肘部尺神经病变单纯减压术后最小临床重要差异
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Apr;38(4):652-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
2
An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the surgery for ulnar nerve (SUN) study group.肘管尺神经病变的结局研究:外科治疗肘管尺神经病变(SUN)研究组的多中心研究。
Neurosurgery. 2013 Jun;72(6):971-81; discussion 981-2; quiz 982. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828ca327.
3
The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire.密歇根手部结果问卷的最小临床重要差异。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Mar;34(3):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.001.
4
Predictors of functional outcomes after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the SUN study group.单纯肘管减压术治疗肘管尺神经病变术后功能预后的预测因素:SUN 研究组的一项多中心研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr;95(4):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.028. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
5
Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.3种患者自评结局工具的最小临床重要差异
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Apr;38(4):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.腕管松解术后密歇根手部结果问卷与腕管问卷的比较反应性
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Feb;34(2):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.021.
7
Comparison of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and PROMIS Instruments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.密歇根手部结果问卷、波士顿腕管综合征问卷和患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)工具在腕管综合征中的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 May;44(5):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.接受减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的主要患者报告结局测量指标的最小临床重要差异。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105966. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105966. Epub 2020 May 30.
9
The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.从患者角度看脊柱手术的质量:第2部分。用核心结局指标指数衡量改善和恶化的最小临床重要差异
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
10
Patient Characteristics in Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow at a Tertiary Referral Hospital and Predictive Factors for Outcomes of Simple Decompression versus Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve.三级转诊医院肘管尺神经压迫患者特征及单纯减压与尺神经皮下转位术治疗效果的预测因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 19;2019:5302462. doi: 10.1155/2019/5302462. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Volar Locking Plate versus Closed Reduction and Immobilization for Distal Radius Fracture in the Elderly: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.老年桡骨远端骨折采用掌侧锁定钢板与闭合复位及固定的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Wrist Surg. 2023 Nov 7;13(6):559-571. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1774331. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
An Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Usage in Hand Surgery.手部手术中患者报告的结局指标及最小临床重要差异应用的评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Dec 18;11(12):e5490. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005490. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Resilience and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Hand Surgery.接受手部骨科手术患者的恢复力与患者报告结局
Hand (N Y). 2025 Mar;20(2):305-311. doi: 10.1177/15589447231201872. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Protocol for Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release (EVOCU): an open randomized controlled trial : EVOCU trial: Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release.内镜与开放肘管松解术治疗肘管综合征的方案(EVOCU):一项开放随机对照试验:EVOCU 试验:内镜与开放肘管松解术。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 22;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06234-y.
5
Comparison of Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes in Older Adults Stratified by Chronologic vs Physiologic Age Managed With Casting vs Surgery.比较使用石膏固定与手术治疗的按实际年龄与生理年龄分层的老年桡骨远端骨折患者的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255786. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55786.
6
Osteopathic Medicine in Four Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Diseases: An Observational Trial with Follow-Up.整脊医学治疗四种慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛疾病的效果观察:一项随访研究
Complement Med Res. 2022;29(1):53-66. doi: 10.1159/000518311. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
7
Beyond the Cubital Tunnel: Use of Adjunctive Procedures in the Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.肘管综合征的治疗中辅助手段的应用:肘管之外。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):203-213. doi: 10.1177/1558944721998022. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
8
Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同肘管减压手术技术的安全性和结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352.
9
Volar Locked Plating Versus Closed Reduction and Casting for Acute, Displaced Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.掌侧锁定钢板与闭合复位石膏固定治疗老年移位性桡骨远端骨折的随机对照试验的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jul 15;102(14):1280-1288. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01442.
10
Cost-saving Minimal Incision Endoscopic-assisted Cubital Tunnel Release Using Simple Surgical Instruments: Case Series.使用简单手术器械的节省成本的微创内镜辅助尺神经沟松解术:病例系列
Cureus. 2019 Oct 15;11(10):e5914. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5914.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.肘部尺神经病变的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD006839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub3.
2
What does/should the minimum clinically important difference measure? A reconsideration of its clinical value in evaluating efficacy of lumbar fusion surgery.最小临床重要差异测量的是什么?重新考虑其在评估腰椎融合手术疗效中的临床价值。
Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):387-97. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182327f20.
3
Objective functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿性关节炎硅胶掌指关节置换术后的客观功能结果及患者满意度
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jan;37(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.042.
4
The role of the minimum clinically important difference and its impact on designing a trial.最小临床重要差异的作用及其对试验设计的影响。
Pharm Stat. 2011 May-Jun;10(3):250-6. doi: 10.1002/pst.459. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
Clinimetrics Corner: The Minimal Clinically Important Change Score (MCID): A Necessary Pretense.临床计量学专栏:最小临床重要变化值(MCID):一个必要的托词。
J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(4):E82-3. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.4.82E.
6
Reporting of minimum clinically important differences in surgical trials.外科手术试验中最小临床重要差异的报告。
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Apr;79(4):301-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04865.x.
7
The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire.密歇根手部结果问卷的最小临床重要差异。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Mar;34(3):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.001.
8
Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery.牛津肘关节评分术后的比较反应性和最小变化
Qual Life Res. 2008 Dec;17(10):1257-67. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9409-3. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
9
The ulnar nerve in elbow trauma.肘部创伤中的尺神经
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1108-16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00594.
10
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.理解最小临床重要差异:概念与方法综述
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.