Kim Leonard, Narra Venkat, Yue Ning
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-2681, USA.
Med Dosim. 2013 Summer;38(2):196-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.10.010. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Recent studies have reported potentially clinically meaningful dose differences when heterogeneity correction is used in breast balloon brachytherapy. In this study, we report on the relationship between heterogeneity-corrected and -uncorrected doses for 2 commonly used plan evaluation metrics: maximum point dose to skin surface and maximum point dose to ribs. Maximum point doses to skin surface and ribs were calculated using TG-43 and Varian Acuros for 20 patients treated with breast balloon brachytherapy. The results were plotted against each other and fit with a zero-intercept line. Max skin dose (Acuros) = max skin dose (TG-43) * 0.930 (R(2) = 0.995). The average magnitude of difference from this relationship was 1.1% (max 2.8%). Max rib dose (Acuros) = max rib dose (TG-43) * 0.955 (R(2) = 0.9995). The average magnitude of difference from this relationship was 0.7% (max 1.6%). Heterogeneity-corrected maximum point doses to the skin surface and ribs were proportional to TG-43-calculated doses. The average deviation from proportionality was 1%. The proportional relationship suggests that a different metric other than maximum point dose may be needed to obtain a clinical advantage from heterogeneity correction. Alternatively, if maximum point dose continues to be used in recommended limits while incorporating heterogeneity correction, institutions without this capability may be able to accurately estimate these doses by use of a scaling factor.
近期研究报告称,在乳腺球囊近距离放射治疗中使用不均匀性校正时,可能存在具有临床意义的剂量差异。在本研究中,我们报告了2种常用计划评估指标(皮肤表面最大点剂量和肋骨最大点剂量)的不均匀性校正剂量与未校正剂量之间的关系。使用TG - 43和瓦里安Acuros算法,对20例接受乳腺球囊近距离放射治疗的患者计算皮肤表面和肋骨的最大点剂量。将结果相互绘制,并拟合零截距线。皮肤最大剂量(Acuros)=皮肤最大剂量(TG - 43)×0.930(R² = 0.995)。该关系的平均差异幅度为1.1%(最大2.8%)。肋骨最大剂量(Acuros)=肋骨最大剂量(TG - 43)×0.955(R² = 0.9995)。该关系的平均差异幅度为0.7%(最大1.6%)。皮肤表面和肋骨的不均匀性校正最大点剂量与TG - 43计算的剂量成比例。与比例关系的平均偏差为1%。这种比例关系表明,为了从不均匀性校正中获得临床优势,可能需要除最大点剂量之外的其他指标。或者,如果在纳入不均匀性校正的同时继续将最大点剂量用于推荐限值,没有这种能力的机构或许能够通过使用比例因子准确估计这些剂量。