• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在随机 EMMY 试验中,治疗偏好和治疗分配对患者健康相关生活质量的影响。

The effect of treatment preference and treatment allocation on patients' health-related quality of life in the randomized EMMY trial.

机构信息

Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Department of Radiology, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.019
PMID:23474384
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of preference and treatment allocation on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients in the randomized EMMY trial of hysterectomy versus uterine artery embolization (UAE) for symptomatic uterine fibroids.

STUDY DESIGN

We invited 349 patients eligible for trial participation, of which 177 agreed to participate (the 'randomized group'). Within the randomized group, patients were allocated to. UAE (n=88) or hysterectomy (n=89). The remaining 172 patients refused randomization and received the treatment of their preference (varying from hysterectomy to no treatment at all), of which 103 patients agreed to fill in questionnaires (the 'preference group'). Patients' treatment preferences and HRQOL were assessed at baseline and the patients were prospectively followed to evaluate HRQOL at 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, most patients in the randomized group preferred UAE: 115/177 (65%). In the preference group most patients preferred hysterectomy: 100/172 (58%). At 12 months there was no effect of having had the preferred treatment on HRQOL, neither in the randomized nor in the preference group. The randomized group improved significantly in both mental and physical health, compared to baseline. In the preference group, only mental health improved compared to baseline, while physical health did not improve significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized trial comparing UAE and hysterectomy for symptomatic fibroids, the pre-randomization preference for a specific treatment did not affect HRQOL. Trial participants improved better on physical HRQOL than women who refused to participate.

摘要

目的

确定偏好和治疗分配对接受子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)与子宫切除术治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的随机 EMMY 试验患者健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响。

研究设计

我们邀请了 349 名符合试验条件的患者,其中 177 名同意参加(“随机组”)。在随机组中,患者被分配到 UAE(n=88)或子宫切除术(n=89)。其余 172 名患者拒绝随机化并接受他们偏好的治疗(从子宫切除术到根本不治疗不等),其中 103 名患者同意填写问卷(“偏好组”)。在基线时评估患者的治疗偏好和 HRQOL,并前瞻性随访患者,以评估治疗后 12 个月的 HRQOL。

结果

在基线时,随机组中的大多数患者更喜欢 UAE:115/177(65%)。在偏好组中,大多数患者更喜欢子宫切除术:100/172(58%)。在 12 个月时,接受首选治疗对 HRQOL 没有影响,无论是在随机组还是偏好组中。与基线相比,随机组在心理健康和身体健康方面均有显著改善。在偏好组中,与基线相比,只有心理健康得到改善,而身体健康没有显著改善。

结论

在比较 UAE 和子宫切除术治疗症状性肌瘤的随机试验中,治疗前的偏好并不影响 HRQOL。与拒绝参与的女性相比,试验参与者在身体 HRQOL 方面的改善更好。

相似文献

1
The effect of treatment preference and treatment allocation on patients' health-related quality of life in the randomized EMMY trial.在随机 EMMY 试验中,治疗偏好和治疗分配对患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
2
Symptomatic uterine fibroids: treatment with uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy--results from the randomized clinical Embolisation versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) Trial.有症状的子宫肌瘤:子宫动脉栓塞术或子宫切除术治疗——栓塞术与子宫切除术(EMMY)随机临床试验结果
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):823-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2463070260. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
3
Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial.子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗症状性子宫肌瘤:随机 EMMY 试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):105.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.049. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
4
Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial.子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的经济学评价:随机EMMY试验结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Jul;19(7):1007-16; quiz 1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.001.
5
Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial.子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗症状性子宫肌瘤(EMMY试验):一项随机对照试验的围手术期和术后结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1618-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.017.
6
Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial.子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:随机EMMY试验的10年结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):745.e1-745.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2 years' outcome from the randomized EMMY trial.子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:随机EMMY试验的2年结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):519.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.029.
8
Pain and return to daily activities after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial.子宫动脉栓塞术和子宫切除术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤后的疼痛及恢复日常活动情况:随机EMMY试验结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Mar-Apr;29(2):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0195-9.
9
Uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolization versus abdominal hysterectomy for treatment--a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial.子宫肌瘤:子宫动脉栓塞术与腹式子宫切除术治疗的比较——一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验
Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):425-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2262011716.
10
Uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine myomas.子宫动脉栓塞术作为子宫肌瘤的一种治疗选择。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006 Mar;33(1):125-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2005.12.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Partially randomised patient preference trials as an alternative design to randomised controlled trials: systematic review and meta-analyses.部分随机化患者偏好试验作为随机对照试验的替代设计:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 16;9(10):e031151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031151.
2
The conservative and interventional treatment of fibroids.子宫肌瘤的保守治疗与介入治疗
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Dec 22;111(51-52):877-83. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0877.