• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专科培训对机器人辅助前列腺切除术一年预后的影响。

Impact of fellowship training on one-year outcomes of robotic-assisted prostatectomy.

作者信息

Thiel David D, Hutchinson Ryan, Diehl Nancy, Tavlarides Andrea, Williams Adrienne, Parker Alexander S

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA

出版信息

JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):195-201. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13291597717220.

DOI:10.4293/108680812x13291597717220
PMID:23477165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3481249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We examined 1-year functional and oncologic outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) from a single surgeon entering practice directly from fellowship training.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed the first 100 RALPs performed by one fellowship-trained robotic surgeon. Data included resident involvement during the procedure, perioperative data, and surgical complications (scored using the Clavien grading system). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data were captured using the EPIC questionnaire at baseline (prior to surgery) and at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (82%) had hospital stays of 2 days or less without any postoperative complications, urethral catheter removal was within 14 days of surgery, and none required readmission to the hospital. The overall positive margin rate was 21% (19% for patients with T2 disease). Clavien grades 1 through 4 complication rates, respectively, were 4%, 10%, 1%, and 1%. There were no deaths, reoperations, or bladder neck contractures. One patient (1%) required a blood transfusion within the 90-day perioperative period. At 1-year follow-up, 78% of patients reported wearing no pads; 41.3% of patients with baseline and 1-year follow-up data reported having intercourse.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide baseline data pertaining to the morbidity, oncologic efficacy, continence results, and potency outcomes of new surgeons performing RALP.

摘要

背景与目的

我们研究了一名刚结束 fellowship 培训后直接执业的外科医生实施的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)的 1 年功能和肿瘤学结局。

方法

我们前瞻性分析了该名接受过 fellowship 培训的机器人外科医生实施的前 100 例 RALP。数据包括手术过程中住院医生的参与情况、围手术期数据以及手术并发症(使用 Clavien 分级系统评分)。使用 EPIC 问卷在基线(手术前)和 1 年随访时收集与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)数据。

结果

82 例患者(82%)住院时间为 2 天或更短,无任何术后并发症,导尿管在手术后 14 天内拔除,且无人需要再次入院。总体切缘阳性率为 21%(T2 期疾病患者为 19%)。Clavien 1 至 4 级并发症发生率分别为 4%、10%、1%和 1%。无死亡、再次手术或膀胱颈挛缩发生。一名患者(1%)在 90 天围手术期内需要输血。在 1 年随访时,78%的患者报告无需使用护垫;有基线和 1 年随访数据的患者中,41.3%报告有性生活。

结论

我们提供了有关新外科医生实施 RALP 的发病率、肿瘤学疗效、控尿结果和性功能结局的基线数据。

相似文献

1
Impact of fellowship training on one-year outcomes of robotic-assisted prostatectomy.专科培训对机器人辅助前列腺切除术一年预后的影响。
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):195-201. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13291597717220.
2
Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较:基于经过验证的生活质量结局的比较效果研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):898-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10551.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
3
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
4
Transition from resident robotic training program to clinical practice: robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy benchmark for perioperative safety.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jun;23(6):516-20. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0503. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放手术的比较:单刀医生的学习曲线比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0569. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
6
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.单控制台与双控制台机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:对教学机构中手术中和术后结果的影响。
World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):781-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1349-7. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of urinary continence outcome between robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术尿控结果的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Apr;97(4):393-8.
9
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术:从单纯腹腔镜手术向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变。
Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9.
10
Safety and peri-operative outcomes during learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons versus experienced open radical prostatectomy surgeons incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术学习曲线期间的安全性和围手术期结果: fellowship 培训的机器人外科医生与经验丰富的开放根治性前列腺切除术外科医生相结合进行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的多机构研究。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1665-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0657.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后非计划性医院就诊和再入院情况的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Oct;15(10):E531-E544. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6931.
2
Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.单控制台与双控制台机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:对教学机构中手术中和术后结果的影响。
World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):781-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1349-7. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的安全性概况:3317 例患者并发症的标准化报告。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):684-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.045. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
2
Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.五边形:用于报告机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术结果的新概念。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
3
Safety and peri-operative outcomes during learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons versus experienced open radical prostatectomy surgeons incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术学习曲线期间的安全性和围手术期结果: fellowship 培训的机器人外科医生与经验丰富的开放根治性前列腺切除术外科医生相结合进行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的多机构研究。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1665-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0657.
4
Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system.单外科医生 2500 例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的早期并发症发生率:应用标准化分级系统的报告。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):945-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
5
Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.机器人泌尿外科手术的培训、认证、监考及法医学风险:泌尿外科机器人外科医生学会的建议
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.042. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
6
Robotic surgical training of the urologic oncologist.泌尿外科肿瘤学家的机器人手术培训。
Urol Oncol. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.09.019.
7
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the first 100 patients-improving patient safety and outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:前100例患者——提高患者安全性及手术效果
J Endourol. 2009 Mar;23(3):481-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0241.
8
Prospective evaluation of factors affecting operating time in a residency/fellowship training program incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.在一个纳入机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的住院医师/专科培训项目中,对影响手术时间的因素进行前瞻性评估。
J Endourol. 2008 Jun;22(6):1331-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0023.
9
Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate.学员不会对以手术时间、估计失血量和手术切缘阳性率为特征的机器人前列腺切除术的机构学习曲线产生负面影响。
Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.023.
10
Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.前列腺癌幸存者的生活质量及对治疗结果的满意度
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311.