• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy.腹腔镜检查的直接套管针插入术。
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):255-9. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376383.
2
Direct trocar insertion technique: an alternative for creation of pneumoperitoneum.直接套管针插入技术:一种建立气腹的替代方法。
JSLS. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):156-8.
3
Direct trocar insertion without previous pneumoperitoneum versus insertion after insufflation with Veress needle in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜妇科手术中直接穿刺套管针(不预先建立气腹)与使用韦氏针充气后穿刺套管针插入的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Oct;39(7):1000-1005. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1590804. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
4
Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.腹腔镜入路:技术、科技与并发症综述
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2.
5
Laparoscopic Access: Direct Trocar Insertion Versus Open Technique.腹腔镜入路:直接套管针插入术与开放技术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Apr;29(4):489-494. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0408. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study.非肥胖患者腹腔镜手术中直接套管针插入与韦雷氏针的比较:一项随机前瞻性单中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2004 Dec;18(12):1778-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9010-y. Epub 2004 Oct 13.
7
Comparison of Direct Trocar Insertion with Other Techniques for Laparoscopy.直接套管针插入术与其他腹腔镜检查技术的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Nov;26(11):917-919.
8
Comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar technique during laparoscopic initial entry via Palmer's point.经帕尔默点进行腹腔镜初始穿刺时Veress针与直接套管针技术的比较。
Ceska Gynekol. 2024;89(6):451-458. doi: 10.48095/cccg2024451.
9
Major and minor complications in Veress needle (VN) and direct trocar insertion (DTI) for laparoscopic closed-entry techniques: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Veress 针(VN)和直接套管针插入(DTI)在腹腔镜封闭入路技术中的主要和次要并发症:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Apr 17;408(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02891-8.
10
Latif's point: A new point for Veress needle insertion for pneumoperitoneum in difficult laparoscopy.拉蒂夫点:困难腹腔镜手术中用于气腹的韦雷斯针插入新点。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 May;11(2):133-137. doi: 10.1111/ases.12418. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
E-Z Point: A New Safe and Reproducible Laparoscopic Entry in the Left Upper Quadrant Using a Veress Needle.E-Z点:一种使用Veress针在左上腹进行安全且可重复的腹腔镜穿刺入路新方法。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):300-306. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_70_22. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Laparoscopic entry techniques: Which should you prefer?腹腔镜入路技术:您应该选择哪种?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;160(3):742-750. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14412. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3
Port Site Consequences After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using an Open Versus Closed Approach of Pneumoperitoneum.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用开放与闭合气腹方法后的穿刺孔相关后果
Cureus. 2022 Jul 1;14(7):e26499. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26499. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Prospective Observational Study of Comparison Between Direct and High-Pressure Primary Trocar Entry in Gynaecological Laparoscopy in Teaching Hospital.教学医院妇科腹腔镜手术中直接与高压初级套管针穿刺入路比较的前瞻性观察研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Dec;71(6):615-620. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01471-4. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
5
Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs in late gestation.妊娠晚期犬的腹腔镜卵巢切除术。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Jan 8;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1770-z.
6
Safe and easy access technique for the first trocar in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中首个套管针的安全简易置入技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):909-12. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1474-4. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
7
Safer trocar insertion for closed laparoscopic access: ex vivo assessment of an improved Veress needle.用于闭合式腹腔镜入路的更安全套管针插入:改良韦雷氏针的体外评估
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):779-782. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4245-3. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中的进入并发症。
J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009 Jan;1(1):4-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1216.51902.
2
Direct trocar versus veress needle entry for laparoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.直接套管穿刺与 Veress 针穿刺用于腹腔镜检查:一项随机临床试验。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69(4):260-263. doi: 10.1159/000276571. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
3
Laparoscopic peritoneal entry preferences among Canadian gynaecologists.加拿大妇科医生对腹腔镜进入腹腔方式的偏好
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jul;31(7):641-8. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34243-8.
4
Comparison of closed and open methods of pneumoperitonium in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中气腹封闭法与开放法的比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Apr-Jun;20(2):85-9.
5
Patterns and predictors of laparoscopic complications in pediatric urology: the role of ongoing surgical volume and access techniques.小儿泌尿外科腹腔镜手术并发症的模式及预测因素:持续手术量和入路技术的作用
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):681-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.042. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
6
Direct trocar insertion technique: an alternative for creation of pneumoperitoneum.直接套管针插入技术:一种建立气腹的替代方法。
JSLS. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):156-8.
7
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub2.
8
Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.腹腔镜进入技术:临床指南、全国性调查及法医学影响
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2686-97. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9871-6. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
9
Comparison between direct trocar and Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中直接套管针穿刺与韦尔尼斯针穿刺的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Dec;17(6):709-12. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0015.
10
Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.腹腔镜入路:技术、科技与并发症综述
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2.

腹腔镜检查的直接套管针插入术。

Direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy.

作者信息

Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Bedin N

机构信息

Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Civile, Via Forlanini 71, Vittorio Veneto (TV), Italy.

出版信息

JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):255-9. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376383.

DOI:10.4293/108680812x13427982376383
PMID:23477174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3481240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Veress needle (VN) technique for establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery is widely used and yet is associated with slow insufflation rates and potentially life-threatening complications. Although these complications have been rarely reported, they represent a major source of morbidity and mortality from laparoscopic procedures and a major reason for conversion to open surgery. The open laparoscopy (OL) is an alternative to the VN technique, being relatively safer, even if considered cumbersome by many authors. Recently, the direct trocar insertion (DTI) technique of establishing pneumoperitoneum has been reported as an alternative to both techniques, but it is largely confined to gynecologic procedures. We report a case-series study where we evaluate the patients who underwent a DTI entry for laparoscopy during a recent 5-year period, focusing attention on feasibility, safety, and the benefits of DTI.

METHODS

This is a case series of 2175 different laparoscopic procedures (1456 [66.9%] scheduled cases and 719 [33%] emergencies). In 2091 (96.1%) of them (1425 [68.1%] scheduled cases and 666 [31.8%] emergencies), pneumoperitoneum was established with DTI, either in the umbilicus or in Palmer's point.

RESULTS

There were no injuries, either minor or major. Peritoneal access and the creation of a laparoscopic workplace were obtained quickly and efficiently by DTI.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that DTI is a fast, safe, and reliable alternative to traditional techniques for pneumoperitoneum establishment and should be regarded as a part of the surgical armamentarium of a trained laparoscopic surgeon.

摘要

背景

Veress针(VN)技术在腹腔镜手术中用于建立气腹广泛应用,但存在气腹充气速度慢以及潜在的危及生命的并发症。尽管这些并发症鲜有报道,但它们是腹腔镜手术发病和死亡的主要来源,也是转为开放手术的主要原因。开放腹腔镜手术(OL)是VN技术的一种替代方法,相对更安全,尽管许多作者认为其操作繁琐。最近,直接套管针插入(DTI)技术作为建立气腹的一种替代方法已被报道,可替代上述两种技术,但主要局限于妇科手术。我们报告一项病例系列研究,评估了近5年期间接受DTI入路腹腔镜手术的患者,重点关注DTI的可行性、安全性和益处。

方法

这是一个包含2175例不同腹腔镜手术的病例系列(1456例[66.9%]择期病例和719例[33%]急诊病例)。其中2091例(96.1%)(1425例[68.1%]择期病例和666例[31.8%]急诊病例)通过DTI在脐部或帕尔默点建立气腹。

结果

无轻微或严重损伤。通过DTI可快速有效地实现腹膜进入并创建腹腔镜手术操作空间。

结论

我们的结果表明,DTI是一种快速、安全且可靠的替代传统气腹建立技术的方法,应被视为训练有素的腹腔镜外科医生手术器械库的一部分。