Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Mar;36(1):51-3. doi: 10.1037/h0094749.
The present study examines the relationships between theoretical domains of recovery as put forth by Whitley and Drake (Whitley, R., & Drake, R. [2010]. Recovery: A dimensional approach. Psychiatric Services, 61, 1248-1250). Specifically, it proposes that nonclinical components of recovery can mediate, or account for, the relationship between clinical recovery (e.g., less psychiatric distress) and more participation in community activities.
Three hundred adults recruited from an outpatient community mental health population were interviewed once using self-report questionnaires about community experiences, social functioning, and psychiatric symptoms. Present analyses used the Recovery Assessment Scale, the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index, and a community activities measure designed for the study.
A series of linear regressions supported the model of nonclinical recovery as a mediator of the hypothesized relationship.
Findings hold implications for integrating the dimensions of recovery, as both components seem to promote community integration. Future research should further explore the relationships between all dimensions of recovery.
本研究考察了 Whitley 和 Drake(Whitley,R.,& Drake,R. [2010]。恢复:多维方法。精神病学服务,61,1248-1250)提出的恢复理论领域之间的关系。具体来说,它提出非临床康复成分可以中介或解释临床康复(例如,较少的精神困扰)与更多参与社区活动之间的关系。
从门诊社区心理健康人群中招募了 300 名成年人,他们使用自我报告问卷一次性接受了关于社区经历、社会功能和精神症状的访谈。目前的分析使用了恢复评估量表、简明症状量表全球严重程度指数和为该研究设计的社区活动量表。
一系列线性回归支持非临床康复作为假设关系的中介的模型。
研究结果对整合恢复的各个维度具有重要意义,因为这两个维度似乎都促进了社区融合。未来的研究应进一步探索所有恢复维度之间的关系。