Department of Psychology, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(1-2):84-96. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9578-2.
Although an extensive body of literature highlights the important role of social support for individuals with psychiatric disabilities, definitions of support tend to be restricted-focusing on intimate relationships such as friend and family networks and ignoring the role of casual relationships existing naturally in the community. This mixed-methods study of 300 consumers of mental health services in the Southeastern US aims to better understand the impact of community supports, termed distal supports, on community integration and recovery from mental illness. Qualitative content analysis, tests of group mean differences, and hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed the following: (1) participants primarily reported receiving tangible support (e.g., free medication/discounted goods) from distal supports rather than emotional support (e.g., displays of warmth/affection) or informational support (e.g., provision of advice); (2) women and older participants reported more distal supports than men or younger participants; and (3) distal supports played a unique role in predicting community integration and recovery even after accounting for the influence of traditional support networks. Results highlight the importance of considering diverse types of social support in naturally occurring settings when designing treatment plans and interventions aimed at encouraging community participation and adaptive functioning for individuals with psychiatric disabilities.
尽管大量文献强调了社会支持对于精神残疾个体的重要作用,但支持的定义往往较为局限——聚焦于亲密关系,如朋友和家庭网络,而忽略了社区中自然存在的偶然关系的作用。本项在美国东南部针对 300 名精神健康服务消费者的混合方法研究旨在更好地理解社区支持(称为远端支持)对社区融入和精神疾病康复的影响。定性内容分析、组间均值差异检验和分层线性回归分析揭示了以下结果:(1)参与者主要报告从远端支持中获得有形支持(例如免费药物/折扣商品),而不是情感支持(例如温暖/爱意的表达)或信息支持(例如提供建议);(2)女性和年长的参与者比男性或年轻的参与者报告了更多的远端支持;(3)即使考虑到传统支持网络的影响,远端支持在预测社区融入和康复方面仍具有独特作用。研究结果强调了在设计旨在鼓励精神残疾个体参与社区和适应功能的治疗计划和干预措施时,需要考虑自然环境中不同类型的社会支持。