Departments of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0541, USA.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 8;173(7):542-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2912.
Inappropriate use of colonoscopy involves unnecessary risk for older patients and consumes resources that could be used more effectively.
To determine the frequency of potentially inappropriate colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries in Texas and to examine variation among physicians and across geographic regions.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used 100% Medicare claims data for Texas and a 5% sample from the United States from 2000 through 2009. We identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 years or older who underwent a colonoscopy from October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009.
Colonoscopies were classified as screening in the absence of a diagnosis suggesting an indication for the procedure. Screening colonoscopy was considered potentially inappropriate on the basis of patient age or occurrence too soon after colonoscopy with negative findings. The percentage of patients undergoing potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy was estimated for each colonoscopist and hospital service area.
A large percentage of colonoscopies performed in older adults were potentially inappropriate: 23.4% for the overall Texas cohort and 9.9%, 38.8%, and 24.9%, respectively, in patients aged 70 to 75, 76 to 85, or 86 years or older. There was considerable variation across the 797 colonoscopists in the percentages of colonoscopies performed that were potentially inappropriate. In a multilevel model including patient sex, race or ethnicity, number of comorbid conditions, educational level, and urban or rural residence, 73 colonoscopists had percentages significantly above the mean (23.9%), ranging from 28.7% to 45.5%, and 119 had percentages significantly below the mean (23.9%), ranging from 6.7% to 18.6%. The colonoscopists with percentages significantly above the mean were more likely to be surgeons, graduates of US medical schools, medical school graduates before 1990, and higher-volume colonoscopists than those with percentages significantly below the mean. Colonoscopist rankings were fairly stable over time (2006-2007 vs 2008-2009). There was also geographic variation across Texas and the United States, with percentages ranging from 13.3% to 34.9% in Texas and from 19.5% to 30.5% across the United States.
Many colonoscopies performed in older adults may be inappropriate. The likelihood of undergoing potentially inappropriate colonoscopy depends in part on where patients live and what physician they see.
对于老年患者来说,不恰当地使用结肠镜检查会带来不必要的风险,并消耗本可更有效地利用的资源。
确定在德克萨斯州的医疗保险受益人群中潜在不适当结肠镜检查的频率,并检查医生之间和地理区域之间的差异。
设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2000 年至 2009 年来自德克萨斯州的 100%医疗保险索赔数据和美国的 5%抽样数据。我们确定了 2008 年 10 月 1 日至 2009 年 9 月 30 日期间接受结肠镜检查的年龄在 70 岁或以上的医疗保险受益人群。
如果没有提示该程序适应证的诊断,结肠镜检查被归类为筛查。根据患者年龄或在结肠镜检查后不久发现阴性结果而进行的筛查性结肠镜检查被认为是潜在不适当的。估计了每个结肠镜医师和医院服务区域内进行潜在不适当筛查性结肠镜检查的患者比例。
在老年患者中进行的大量结肠镜检查可能是不适当的:在整个德克萨斯队列中占 23.4%,在年龄 70 至 75 岁、76 至 85 岁或 86 岁或以上的患者中分别占 9.9%、38.8%和 24.9%。在 797 名结肠镜医师中,进行的结肠镜检查中有相当大的比例是潜在不适当的。在包括患者性别、种族或民族、合并症数量、教育水平以及城市或农村居住情况的多水平模型中,73 名结肠镜医师的百分比明显高于平均值(23.9%),范围从 28.7%到 45.5%,而 119 名结肠镜医师的百分比明显低于平均值(23.9%),范围从 6.7%到 18.6%。百分比明显高于平均值的结肠镜医师更有可能是外科医生、毕业于美国医学院、1990 年前毕业的医学院毕业生和高容量结肠镜医师,而百分比明显低于平均值的结肠镜医师则较少。结肠镜医师的排名在一段时间内相当稳定(2006-2007 年与 2008-2009 年)。德克萨斯州和美国各地也存在地域差异,德克萨斯州的百分比范围为 13.3%至 34.9%,而美国的百分比范围为 19.5%至 30.5%。
许多在老年患者中进行的结肠镜检查可能是不适当的。接受潜在不适当结肠镜检查的可能性部分取决于患者居住的地点和他们所看的医生。