• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同骨替代材料用于拔牙后牙槽窝保存的效果比较：一项对照临床研究。

Comparison of the effectiveness of two different bone substitute materials for socket preservation after tooth extraction: a controlled clinical study.

作者信息

Shakibaie-M Behnam

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;33(2):223-8. doi: 10.11607/prd.0734.

DOI:10.11607/prd.0734
PMID:23484178
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two bone substitute materials for socket preservation after tooth extraction. Extraction sockets in 10 patients were filled with either inorganic bovine bone material (Bio-Oss) or with synthetic material consisting of hydroxyapatite and silicon dioxide (NanoBone). Extraction sockets without filling served as the control. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the presented protocol for socket preservation and that the choice of a suitable bone substitute material is crucial. The dimensions of the alveolar ridge were significantly better preserved with Bio-Oss than with NanoBone or without treatment. Bio-Oss treatment resulted in better bone quality and quantity for successful implant placement.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种骨替代材料在拔牙后牙槽窝保存中的有效性。10名患者的拔牙窝分别填充无机牛骨材料（Bio-Oss）或由羟基磷灰石和二氧化硅组成的合成材料（NanoBone）。未填充的拔牙窝作为对照。结果表明了所提出的牙槽窝保存方案的有效性，并且选择合适的骨替代材料至关重要。与NanoBone或未治疗相比，Bio-Oss能显著更好地保存牙槽嵴的尺寸。Bio-Oss治疗为成功植入种植体带来了更好的骨质量和骨量。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of two different bone substitute materials for socket preservation after tooth extraction: a controlled clinical study.两种不同骨替代材料用于拔牙后牙槽窝保存的效果比较：一项对照临床研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;33(2):223-8. doi: 10.11607/prd.0734.
2
Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial.采用合成纳米羟基磷灰石与牛异种骨对比保存拔牙窝的临床、组织学和组织形态计量学评估：一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02288.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
3
Healing of ungrafted and grafted extraction sockets after 12 weeks: a prospective clinical study.未经植骨和植骨拔牙窝 12 周后的愈合情况：一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):385-92.
4
Bio-Oss(®) for delayed osseointegration of implants in dogs: a histological study.Bio-Oss(®)用于犬类种植体延迟骨结合的组织学研究。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;52(8):729-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
5
Alveolar ridge augmentation: comparison of two socket graft materials in implant cases.牙槽嵴增高术：种植病例中两种牙槽窝植骨材料的比较
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(9):E146-55.
6
Alveolar ridge augmentation: comparison of two socket graft materials in implant cases.牙槽嵴增高术：种植病例中两种牙槽窝植骨材料的比较
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011 Mar;32(2):e16-24.
7
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.一项评估和比较在增强型和非增强型拔牙窝中植入物的随机临床试验：3 年结果。
J Periodontol. 2012 Jul;83(7):836-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110205. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
8
A novel approach to preserve the buccal wall in immediate implant cases: a clinical report.一种在即刻种植病例中保留颊侧骨壁的新方法：临床报告
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Apr;39(2):198-205. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00082. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
Demineralized bone matrix in extraction sockets: a clinical and histologic case series.脱矿骨基质在拔牙窝中的应用：一项临床和组织学病例系列研究。
Implant Dent. 2013 Apr;22(2):120-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182859869.
10
Labial soft tissue volume evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial.拔牙后不同牙槽嵴保存技术的唇侧软组织体积评估：一项随机对照临床试验
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):612-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12246. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological Comparative Study Between Conventional and Nano Hydroxyapatite With Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Membranes for Their Effects on Alveolar Bone Density.传统羟基磷灰石与纳米羟基磷灰石联合富血小板纤维蛋白（PRF）膜对牙槽骨密度影响的放射学对比研究
Cureus. 2022 Dec 10;14(12):e32381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32381. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
The Cytokine and Bone Protein Expression by Ellagic Acid-Hydroxyapatite in Bone Remodelling Model.鞣花酸-羟磷灰石在骨重塑模型中的细胞因子和骨蛋白表达。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Dec 13;2022:6740853. doi: 10.1155/2022/6740853. eCollection 2022.
3
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.
缺失牙的修复干预：用于种植体位点开发的牙槽嵴保存技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 26;4(4):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub3.
4
Calcium Phosphate Modified with Silicon vs. Bovine Hydroxyapatite for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Densitometric Evaluation, Morphological Changes and Histomorphometric Study.用于牙槽嵴保存的硅修饰磷酸钙与牛羟基磷灰石的比较：骨密度评估、形态学变化及组织形态计量学研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 17;14(4):940. doi: 10.3390/ma14040940.
5
The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review.羟基磷灰石骨替代物移植在牙槽嵴保存、上颌窦提升和牙周骨缺损中的应用：一项系统评价。
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 2;4(10):e00884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00884. eCollection 2018 Oct.
6
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.缺失牙修复干预措施：用于牙种植位点开发的牙槽嵴保存技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 28;2015(5):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub2.