• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能否通过石器技术确定手的优势?

Can hand laterality be identified through lithic technology?

机构信息

a IPHES, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social , Tarragona , Spain.

出版信息

Laterality. 2014;19(1):37-63. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.769559. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2013.769559
PMID:23485016
Abstract

In this paper we present a new method for inferring handedness from lithic evidence. The study was conducted by means of an experimental programme in stone-knapping, after which the resulting lithic products (tools) were analysed. These lithic tools were produced by 15 inexpert knappers (8 right-handed and 7 left-handed), because we were not able to find a statistically significant number of left-handed expert knappers. We considered inexpert knappers to include individuals who had never struck two pebbles together, as well as individuals who were quite familiar with prehistoric tools and had had some degree of practice. The Mann-Whitney U test proved that all of them produced flakes with the same technical features, so within this sample expertise was not a factor that affected the presence or absence of the technical features analysed to determine hand laterality. The results of the experiment indicate that no single variable can be used to determine the laterality of the knapper, but rather the evidence of handedness lies in the combination of several variables. Furthermore, not all the flakes display the entire set of significant features. Therefore this study concludes that it is not possible to determine the handedness of a knapper through a single variable present on his or her flakes, but it may be possible to determine laterality by examining a combination of technical variables on a number of his or her pieces. Archaeologically, only well-preserved knapping events with numerous refitting products can be assigned to a left- or a right-handed knapper.

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种从石器证据推断惯用手的新方法。该研究通过石器打制的实验方案进行,之后对产生的石器产品(工具)进行了分析。这些石器工具是由 15 名非专业石器工匠(8 名惯用右手,7 名惯用左手)制作的,因为我们无法找到数量足够多的惯用左手的专业石器工匠。我们将非专业石器工匠定义为从未将两块鹅卵石敲在一起的人,以及对史前工具非常熟悉并有一定实践经验的人。曼-惠特尼 U 检验证明,他们所有人制作的石片都具有相同的技术特征,因此在这个样本中,专业技能并不是影响分析确定手的惯用侧的技术特征存在或不存在的因素。实验结果表明,没有任何单一变量可以用来确定打制者的惯用手,而是惯用手的证据在于几个变量的组合。此外,并非所有的石片都显示出所有显著特征。因此,本研究得出的结论是,不能通过石器上存在的单一变量来确定打制者的惯用手,但通过检查其大量石器上的一些技术变量的组合,可能可以确定惯用手。在考古学上,只有保存完好的打制事件和大量的重组产品才能被分配给惯用右手或惯用左手的打制者。

相似文献

1
Can hand laterality be identified through lithic technology?能否通过石器技术确定手的优势?
Laterality. 2014;19(1):37-63. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.769559. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
2
In pursuit of our ancestors' hand laterality.追寻我们祖先的用手偏好。
J Hum Evol. 2017 Oct;111:18-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: the case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya.上新世晚期人类的打制石器技能:以肯尼亚图尔卡纳湖以西的洛卡莱伊2C遗址为例
J Hum Evol. 2005 May;48(5):435-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.12.005.
4
Right and left handedness defined: a multivariate approach using hand preference and hand performance measures.左右手习惯的定义:一种使用手偏好和手部表现测量的多变量方法。
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2001 Jul-Sep;14(3):144-52.
5
Laterality in the first Neolithic and Chalcolithic farming communities in northern Iberia.伊比利亚半岛北部新石器时代和铜石并用时代早期农耕社区的偏侧性。
Laterality. 2015 May;20(3):371-87. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.982130. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
6
How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology.石匠如何预测和控制剥落的结果?对理解早期石器技术的启示。
J Hum Evol. 2010 Aug;59(2):155-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
7
Dynamics of manual skill: a computerized analysis of single peg movements and stochastic resonance hypothesis of cerebral laterality.手动技能的动力学:单栓移动的计算机化分析及大脑偏侧性的随机共振假说
Int J Neurosci. 2008 Mar;118(3):399-432. doi: 10.1080/00207450701668012.
8
The lithic assemblages of Donggutuo, Nihewan basin: Knapping skills of early pleistocene hominins in North China.泥河湾盆地东谷坨的石器组合:华北早更新世人类的打片技术
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185101. eCollection 2017.
9
Is it possible to change handedness after only a short period of practice? Effects of 15 days of intensive practice on left-hand writing in strong right-handers.仅经过短期练习是否有可能改变惯用手?15 天的强化练习对强右利手者左手书写的影响。
Laterality. 2019 Jul;24(4):432-449. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1534856. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
10
Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language.教授制作石器:支持语言起源技术假说的新实验证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y.