a IPHES, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social , Tarragona , Spain.
Laterality. 2014;19(1):37-63. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.769559. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
In this paper we present a new method for inferring handedness from lithic evidence. The study was conducted by means of an experimental programme in stone-knapping, after which the resulting lithic products (tools) were analysed. These lithic tools were produced by 15 inexpert knappers (8 right-handed and 7 left-handed), because we were not able to find a statistically significant number of left-handed expert knappers. We considered inexpert knappers to include individuals who had never struck two pebbles together, as well as individuals who were quite familiar with prehistoric tools and had had some degree of practice. The Mann-Whitney U test proved that all of them produced flakes with the same technical features, so within this sample expertise was not a factor that affected the presence or absence of the technical features analysed to determine hand laterality. The results of the experiment indicate that no single variable can be used to determine the laterality of the knapper, but rather the evidence of handedness lies in the combination of several variables. Furthermore, not all the flakes display the entire set of significant features. Therefore this study concludes that it is not possible to determine the handedness of a knapper through a single variable present on his or her flakes, but it may be possible to determine laterality by examining a combination of technical variables on a number of his or her pieces. Archaeologically, only well-preserved knapping events with numerous refitting products can be assigned to a left- or a right-handed knapper.
在本文中,我们提出了一种从石器证据推断惯用手的新方法。该研究通过石器打制的实验方案进行,之后对产生的石器产品(工具)进行了分析。这些石器工具是由 15 名非专业石器工匠(8 名惯用右手,7 名惯用左手)制作的,因为我们无法找到数量足够多的惯用左手的专业石器工匠。我们将非专业石器工匠定义为从未将两块鹅卵石敲在一起的人,以及对史前工具非常熟悉并有一定实践经验的人。曼-惠特尼 U 检验证明,他们所有人制作的石片都具有相同的技术特征,因此在这个样本中,专业技能并不是影响分析确定手的惯用侧的技术特征存在或不存在的因素。实验结果表明,没有任何单一变量可以用来确定打制者的惯用手,而是惯用手的证据在于几个变量的组合。此外,并非所有的石片都显示出所有显著特征。因此,本研究得出的结论是,不能通过石器上存在的单一变量来确定打制者的惯用手,但通过检查其大量石器上的一些技术变量的组合,可能可以确定惯用手。在考古学上,只有保存完好的打制事件和大量的重组产品才能被分配给惯用右手或惯用左手的打制者。