• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教授制作石器:支持语言起源技术假说的新实验证据。

Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language.

机构信息

IPHES, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evoluciò Social, Zona educacional 4 (Edif. W3), Campus Sescelades URV, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.

Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Campus Catalunya, Avinguda de Catalunya, 35, 43002, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y
PMID:29089534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5663762/
Abstract

The relationship between lithic technology, learning and language is a topic of growing interest in human evolution studies, and has therefore been the subject of numerous scientific papers in recent years. To evaluate the role of language in the social transmission of lithic technology, we designed and developed an experimental protocol through which we compared the acquisition of knapping skills in thirty non-experts in the early stages of learning, by means of three mechanisms of social transmission: imitation-emulation, gestural communication, and verbal communication. All the apprentice knappers carried out the experimental task with blanks that were equal in shape and size, and were requested to replicate what the expert knapper was doing: the alternating method, a sufficiently simple, but systematic technique for detaching flakes from a core. We analysed each participant's actions, including those of the master knapper, the final products (flakes and cores), and the knapping sequences, by analysing the refits. Our results show that the apprentices improved their knapping skills in teaching conditions -both gestural and verbal communication-, and specially through the latter. In conclusion, our study supports the hypothesis of co-evolution between lithic technology and social learning, which could have favoured the emergence of verbal language.

摘要

石器技术、学习和语言之间的关系是人类进化研究中日益关注的话题,因此近年来已经成为众多科学论文的主题。为了评估语言在石器技术的社会传播中的作用,我们设计并开发了一个实验方案,通过该方案,我们比较了 30 名非专家在学习初期通过三种社会传播机制(模仿-模拟、手势交流和言语交流)获得打制石器技能的情况。所有学徒打制石器的人都使用形状和大小相同的毛坯进行实验任务,并要求他们复制专家打制石器的做法:交替法,一种从核心上分离石片的足够简单但系统的技术。我们通过分析重组,分析了每个参与者的动作,包括主打制石器人的动作、最终产品(石片和核心)和打制石器的顺序。我们的结果表明,学徒在教学条件下——包括手势和言语交流——特别是通过后者提高了他们的打制石器技能。总之,我们的研究支持了石器技术和社会学习共同进化的假设,这可能促进了语言的出现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/1c5a16bc2057/41598_2017_14322_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/8711d44f272a/41598_2017_14322_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/167684c63a03/41598_2017_14322_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/773355698cad/41598_2017_14322_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/2d41331fa4ac/41598_2017_14322_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/1c5a16bc2057/41598_2017_14322_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/8711d44f272a/41598_2017_14322_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/167684c63a03/41598_2017_14322_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/773355698cad/41598_2017_14322_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/2d41331fa4ac/41598_2017_14322_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bfe/5663762/1c5a16bc2057/41598_2017_14322_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language.教授制作石器:支持语言起源技术假说的新实验证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y.
2
Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language.古人类工具制造教学与语言共同进化的实验证据。
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 13;6:6029. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7029.
3
Can hand laterality be identified through lithic technology?能否通过石器技术确定手的优势?
Laterality. 2014;19(1):37-63. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.769559. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
4
The origins of gestures and language: history, current advances and proposed theories.手势和语言的起源:历史、当前进展和提出的理论。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Jun;95(3):531-554. doi: 10.1111/brv.12576. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology.石匠如何预测和控制剥落的结果?对理解早期石器技术的启示。
J Hum Evol. 2010 Aug;59(2):155-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
6
Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.聋儿的手势交流:父母输入对早期语言发展的影响及非影响因素
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1984;49(3-4):1-151.
7
Considering the role of social dynamics and positional behavior in gestural communication research.考虑社会动态和位置行为在手势交际研究中的作用。
Am J Primatol. 2013 Sep;75(9):891-903. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22151. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
8
The lithic assemblages of Donggutuo, Nihewan basin: Knapping skills of early pleistocene hominins in North China.泥河湾盆地东谷坨的石器组合:华北早更新世人类的打片技术
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185101. eCollection 2017.
9
Coordination strategies used in stone knapping.石器加工中的协同策略。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Apr;150(4):539-50. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22224. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age.9至15个月大婴儿的社会认知、共同注意和沟通能力。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1998;63(4):i-vi, 1-143.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs of Early Stone Toolmaking cannot Establish the Presence of Know-how Copying.早期石器制作的成本无法确定是否存在技术复制。
Hum Nat. 2025 Jun;36(2):180-218. doi: 10.1007/s12110-025-09494-w. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Lessons for Theory from Scientific Domains Where Evidence is Sparse or Indirect.证据稀少或间接的科学领域给理论带来的启示。
Comput Brain Behav. 2024;7(4):588-607. doi: 10.1007/s42113-024-00214-8. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins' technical innovations.

本文引用的文献

1
The origins of language in teaching.教学中语言的起源。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):225-231. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1077-7.
2
Experimental studies illuminate the cultural transmission of percussive technologies in Homo and Pan.实验研究揭示了人类和黑猩猩中敲击技术的文化传播。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0359.
3
Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language.古人类工具制造教学与语言共同进化的实验证据。
回归基础:石器技术中“溯源”概念助力追踪古人类技术创新
Evol Anthropol. 2024 Dec;33(6):e22045. doi: 10.1002/evan.22045. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
The evolution of hierarchically structured communication.分层结构通信的演变
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 11;14:1224324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1224324. eCollection 2023.
5
The cultural evolution of teaching.教学的文化演变
Evol Hum Sci. 2023 May 12;5:e14. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.14. eCollection 2023.
6
The architecture of creditions: Openness and otherness.信念的架构:开放性与他性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 21;13:926489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926489. eCollection 2022.
7
Early knapping techniques do not necessitate cultural transmission.早期的石器打制技术并不需要文化传播。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jul 8;8(27):eabo2894. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo2894. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
8
Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills.石器工具制作难度与人类技术技能的演化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09914-2.
9
Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy.获得肉食性动物牙齿窝形态分析中的新分辨率:数字埋藏学的方法更新。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240328. eCollection 2020.
10
Cultural transmission in a food preparation task: The role of interactivity, innovation and storytelling.文化在食物准备任务中的传递:互动、创新和讲故事的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 18;14(9):e0221278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221278. eCollection 2019.
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 13;6:6029. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7029.
4
Acquisition of Paleolithic toolmaking abilities involves structural remodeling to inferior frontoparietal regions.获得旧石器时代的工具制作能力涉及到额顶叶下部区域的结构重塑。
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Jul;220(4):2315-31. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0789-6. Epub 2014 May 25.
5
Shared brain lateralization patterns in language and Acheulean stone tool production: a functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound study.语言和阿舍利石器生产中的共享大脑侧化模式:一项功能 transcranial Doppler 超声研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 30;8(8):e72693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072693. eCollection 2013.
6
Transmission fidelity is the key to the build-up of cumulative culture.传播保真度是累积文化构建的关键。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2171-80. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0119.
7
Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution.石器、语言与人类进化中的大脑
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 12;367(1585):75-87. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0099.
8
From action to language: comparative perspectives on primate tool use, gesture and the evolution of human language.从动作到语言:灵长类动物工具使用、手势与人类语言进化的比较视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 12;367(1585):4-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0295.
9
"An ape's view of the Oldowan" revisited.重新审视“古人类的类人猿视角”。
Evol Anthropol. 2011 Sep-Oct;20(5):181-97. doi: 10.1002/evan.20323.
10
The evolution of teaching.教学的演变。
Evolution. 2011 Oct;65(10):2760-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01370.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.