Program for Recognition and Intervention in Individuals in At-Risk Mental States, Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.036. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Comprehensively review studies evaluating factors associated with adherence to treatment in bipolar disorder (BD), as well as the results of interventions developed to enhance adherence in this population.
The following search engines were consulted: PubMed, Scielo, LILACS and PsycINFO. The keywords used were "Bipolar Disorder", "Factor", "Adherence", "Nonadherence", "Compliance" and "Intervention". In addition, references list of selected studies were consulted searching for relevant articles.
Adherence has been defined in various ways, with some considering adherence vs. nonadherence, and other including a "partial" adherence measure. In addition, methods to assess adherence differ for each study. Several factors were related to poor adherence, including patient-related factors (e.g. younger age, male gender, low level of education, alcohol and drugs comorbidity), disorder-related factors (e.g. younger age of onset, severity of BD, insight and lack of awareness of illness) and treatment-related factors (e.g. side effects of medications, effectiveness). To improve adherence, the main recommendations are to provide customized interventions focusing on the underlying causes of nonadherence, strong therapeutic alliance and different modalities based on psychoeducation.
Our results indicate that nonadherence is a multicausal phenomenon and strategies to prevent and approaches them must include enhanced therapeutic alliance, flexible topics, early intervention, group setting, and psychoeducation.
Different definitions and measures of adherence in the literature currently moderate the generalization of the findings in this review. Further studies are necessary regarding factors of adherence in BD and interventions to improve it, especially on social factors like stigma and family.
全面综述评估双相情感障碍(BD)患者治疗依从性相关因素的研究,并总结提高该人群治疗依从性的干预措施的结果。
检索了以下搜索引擎:PubMed、Scielo、LILACS 和 PsycINFO。使用的关键词为“Bipolar Disorder”“Factor”“Adherence”“Nonadherence”“Compliance”和“Intervention”。此外,还查阅了选定研究的参考文献列表,以寻找相关文章。
依从性有多种定义,有些研究考虑了依从性与不依从性,而其他研究则包括了“部分”依从性测量。此外,每项研究评估依从性的方法也不同。一些因素与治疗不依从相关,包括患者相关因素(如年龄较小、男性、教育程度较低、酒精和药物合并症)、疾病相关因素(如发病年龄较小、BD 严重程度、洞察力和对疾病的认识不足)和治疗相关因素(如药物副作用、疗效)。为了提高依从性,主要的建议是提供针对不依从根本原因的个性化干预措施,建立牢固的治疗联盟,并根据心理教育采用不同的模式。
我们的研究结果表明,不依从是一种多因素现象,预防和解决不依从的策略必须包括增强治疗联盟、灵活的主题、早期干预、小组设置和心理教育。
目前文献中依从性的不同定义和测量方法限制了本综述结果的推广。需要进一步研究 BD 患者依从性的影响因素和改善依从性的干预措施,特别是关于社会因素如污名和家庭的研究。