Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, 248214Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 26632Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;67(10):787-801. doi: 10.1177/07067437221087004. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
This 5-year longitudinal study evaluated patients with an onset of mental disorder (MD) following index emergency department (ED) visits, in terms of (1) patient profiles based on 12-month outpatient follow-up care received, (2) sociodemographic and clinical correlates, and (3) adverse health outcomes for the subsequent 2 years.
Data from administrative databases were collected for 2541 patients with an onset of MD, following discharge from Quebec ED. Latent class analysis was performed to identify patient profiles based on the adequacy of follow-up care after ED discharge. Bivariate analyses examined associations between class membership and sociodemographic and clinical correlates, high ED use (3 + visits/yearly), hospitalizations, and suicidal behaviors.
Five classes of patients were identified. Class 1, the smallest, labeled "patient psychiatrist only," included mainly young patients with serious MD. Classes 2 and 3, roughly 20%, were labeled "high use of patient general practitioner (GP) and psychiatrist" and "low use of patient GP and psychiatrist," respectively. Both included patients with complex MD, but Class 2 had more women and older patients with chronic physical illnesses. The 2 largest classes were labeled "no usual patient service provider" (Class 5) and "patient GP only" (Class 4). Class 5 included more younger men with substance-related disorders, while Class 4 had the older patients living in rural areas, many with common MD and chronic physical illnesses. Class 3 patients had the poorest outcomes, followed by Classes 1 and 2, while Classes 4 and 5 had the best outcomes.
Results revealed that nearly 40% of patients experiencing an onset of MD received little or no outpatient care following ED discharge. Higher severity or complexity of MD and, to a lesser extent, no or low GP follow-up may explain these adverse outcomes. More adequate, continuous care, including collaborative care, is needed for these vulnerable, high-needs patients.
本 5 年纵向研究评估了在急诊部(ED)就诊后出现精神障碍(MD)的患者,从以下几个方面进行评估:(1)根据 12 个月门诊随访治疗所获得的患者特征;(2)社会人口统计学和临床相关性;(3)随后 2 年的不良健康结局。
对从魁北克 ED 出院的 2541 名 MD 发作患者的行政数据库数据进行了收集。基于 ED 出院后随访治疗的充分性,采用潜在类别分析来识别患者特征。二变量分析检查了类别成员与社会人口统计学和临床相关性、高 ED 使用(每年 3 次以上就诊)、住院和自杀行为之间的关联。
确定了 5 类患者。第 1 类,最小的类别,标记为“仅患者精神科医生”,主要包括患有严重 MD 的年轻患者。第 2 类和第 3 类,约 20%,分别标记为“患者普通科医生和精神科医生的高使用”和“患者普通科医生和精神科医生的低使用”。这两类都包括患有复杂 MD 的患者,但第 2 类患者中有更多的女性和患有慢性躯体疾病的老年患者。最大的两个类别标记为“无常规患者服务提供者”(第 5 类)和“仅患者全科医生”(第 4 类)。第 5 类包括更多年轻的物质相关障碍患者,而第 4 类包括居住在农村地区的老年患者,他们大多患有常见 MD 和慢性躯体疾病。第 3 类患者的结局最差,其次是第 1 类和第 2 类,而第 4 类和第 5 类的结局最好。
结果表明,近 40%的 MD 发作患者在 ED 出院后几乎没有或没有接受门诊治疗。更高的 MD 严重程度或复杂性,以及在较小程度上,无或低 GP 随访,可能解释了这些不良结局。这些脆弱、高需求的患者需要更充分、持续的治疗,包括协作治疗。