• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将证据转化为政策,为所有人实现与健康相关的千年发展目标:中国、印度、印度尼西亚和越南的 EPI-4 项目的理由和设计。

Bringing evidence to policy to achieve health-related MDGs for all: justification and design of the EPI-4 project in China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences (Global health/IHCAR), Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2013 Mar 13;6:19650. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19650.

DOI:10.3402/gha.v6i0.19650
PMID:23490302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3597775/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are monitored using national-level statistics, which have shown substantial improvements in many countries. These statistics may be misleading, however, and may divert resources from disadvantaged populations within the same countries that are showing progress. The purpose of this article is to set out the relevance and design of the "Evidence for Policy and Implementation project (EPI-4)". EPI-4 aims to contribute to the reduction of inequities in the achievement of health-related MDGs in China, India, Indonesia and Vietnam through the promotion of research-informed policymaking.

METHODS

Using a framework provided by the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health (CSDH), we compare national-level MDG targets and results, as well as their social and structural determinants, in China, India, Indonesia and Vietnam.

RESULTS

To understand country-level MDG achievements it is useful to analyze their social and structural determinants. This analysis is not sufficient, however, to understand within-country inequities. Specialized analyses are required for this purpose, as is discussion and debate of the results with policymakers, which is the aim of the EPI-4 project.

CONCLUSION

Reducing health inequities requires sophisticated analyses to identify disadvantaged populations within and between countries, and to determine evidence-based solutions that will make a difference. The EPI-4 project hopes to contribute to this goal.

摘要

背景

千年发展目标(MDGs)是通过国家层面的统计数据进行监测的,这些数据显示许多国家都取得了实质性的进步。然而,这些统计数据可能存在误导性,并且可能会将资源从在同一国家内取得进展但处于不利地位的人群中转移。本文旨在阐述“政策与实施项目证据(EPI-4)”的相关性和设计。EPI-4 的目的是通过促进循证决策,为减少中国、印度、印度尼西亚和越南在实现与健康相关的千年发展目标方面的不平等做出贡献。

方法

我们利用卫生保健决定因素委员会(CSDH)提供的框架,比较了中国、印度、印度尼西亚和越南的国家级千年发展目标的具体目标和结果,以及这些目标和结果的社会和结构性决定因素。

结果

要了解国家一级千年发展目标的实现情况,分析其社会和结构性决定因素是有用的。然而,这种分析不足以了解国内的不平等现象。为此目的需要进行专门分析,还需要与决策者讨论和辩论结果,这也是 EPI-4 项目的目的。

结论

减少卫生保健不平等现象需要进行复杂的分析,以确定国内和国家之间处于不利地位的人群,并确定将产生影响的循证解决方案。EPI-4 项目希望为此目标做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bedc/3597775/8b1546dfba8a/GHA-6-19650-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bedc/3597775/8b1546dfba8a/GHA-6-19650-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bedc/3597775/8b1546dfba8a/GHA-6-19650-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Bringing evidence to policy to achieve health-related MDGs for all: justification and design of the EPI-4 project in China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam.将证据转化为政策,为所有人实现与健康相关的千年发展目标:中国、印度、印度尼西亚和越南的 EPI-4 项目的理由和设计。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Mar 13;6:19650. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19650.
2
Millennium development goal four and child health inequities in indonesia: a systematic review of the literature.千年发展目标四与印度尼西亚儿童健康不平等问题:文献系统综述
PLoS One. 2015 May 5;10(5):e0123629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123629. eCollection 2015.
3
Population policies in Southeast Asia and Australia: the international relevance of domestic affairs.东南亚和澳大利亚的人口政策:国内事务的国际关联
J Aust Popul Assoc. 1984 Spring;1:109-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03029405.
4
Population planning: a well co-ordinated approach required.人口规划:需要一种协调良好的方法。
Asian Pac Popul Programme News. 1984;13(1):17-9.
5
Coherence between health policy and human resource strategy: lessons from maternal health in Vietnam, India and China.卫生政策与人力资源战略之间的协调一致:越南、印度和中国孕产妇健康领域的经验教训
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):111-20. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt102. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
6
Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: a literature review.千年发展目标的局限性:文献综述。
Glob Public Health. 2013;8(10):1109-22. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.845676. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
7
Millennium Development Goals: how public health professionals perceive the achievement of MDGs.千年发展目标:公共卫生专业人员如何看待千年发展目标的实现情况。
Glob Health Action. 2014 Sep 22;7:24352. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24352. eCollection 2014.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
The influence of cost-per-DALY information in health prioritisation and desirable features for a registry: a survey of health policy experts in Vietnam, India and Bangladesh.每伤残调整生命年成本信息对卫生优先排序的影响及登记册的理想特征:对越南、印度和孟加拉国卫生政策专家的调查
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Dec 3;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0156-6.
10
[Transition from Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals from the perspective of the social determinants of health and health equity].[从健康的社会决定因素和健康公平的角度看从千年发展目标到可持续发展目标的转变]
Gac Med Mex. 2017 Nov-Dec;153(6):697-730. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M17000017.

引用本文的文献

1
Millennium development goal four and child health inequities in indonesia: a systematic review of the literature.千年发展目标四与印度尼西亚儿童健康不平等问题:文献系统综述
PLoS One. 2015 May 5;10(5):e0123629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123629. eCollection 2015.
2
Targeted interventions for improved equity in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.以目标为导向的干预措施改善中低收入国家母婴健康公平性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e66453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066453. Print 2013.
3
The world we want: focus on the most disadvantaged.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting equity to achieve maternal and child health.促进公平以实现母婴健康。
Reprod Health Matters. 2011 Nov;19(38):176-82. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)38586-2.
2
Priorities for research on equity and health: towards an equity-focused health research agenda.关于公平与健康的研究重点:制定以公平为重点的健康研究议程。
PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001115. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
3
The Millennium Development Goals: a cross-sectoral analysis and principles for goal setting after 2015 Lancet and London International Development Centre Commission.
我们想要的世界:关注最弱势群体。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Apr 10;6:1-3. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20919.
《千年发展目标:跨部门分析及2015年后目标设定原则》 柳叶刀与伦敦国际发展中心委员会
Lancet. 2010 Sep 18;376(9745):991-1023. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61196-8.
4
A framework for mandatory impact evaluation to ensure well informed public policy decisions.一个用于强制性影响评估的框架,以确保做出充分知情的公共政策决策。
Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):427-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61251-4.
5
Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers.在Cochrane协作网内部及外部开展工作,以使系统评价对医疗保健管理人员和政策制定者更有用。
Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):21-33.
6
Evidence-based practice in a global context: the case of neonatal mortality.全球背景下的循证实践:以新生儿死亡率为例
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008;5(4):167-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00136.x.
7
Equity and child-survival strategies.公平与儿童生存策略。
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 May;86(5):399-407. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.044545.
8
Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action.评估各国将研究与行动联系起来的努力。
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):620-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.030312.
9
Making health systems more equitable.使卫生系统更具公平性。
Lancet. 2004;364(9441):1273-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17145-6.
10
Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.卫生政策制定者对其证据运用情况的认知:一项系统综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432778.