• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C-反应蛋白在急性胰腺炎中的预后准确性:测量时间和截断值。

C-reactive protein prognostic accuracy in acute pancreatitis: timing of measurement and cutoff points.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;25(7):784-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835fd3f0.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835fd3f0
PMID:23492986
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

C-reactive protein (CRP) has been used widely in the early risk assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis. This study evaluated the prognostic accuracy of CRP for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), pancreatic necrosis (PNec), and in-hospital mortality (IM) in terms of the best timing for CRP measurement and the optimal CRP cutoff points.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study including 379 patients consecutively admitted with acute pancreatitis. CRP determinations at hospital admission, 24, 48, and 72 h after hospital admission were collected. Discriminative and predictive abilities of CRP for SAP, PNec, and IM were assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. To determine the optimal CRP cutoff points for SAP, PNec, and IM, the minimum P-value approach was used.

RESULTS

In total, 11% of patients had SAP, 20% developed PNec, and 4.2% died. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of CRP at 48 h after hospital admission for SAP, PNec, and IM were 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.90], 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.87), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.91), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-values of CRP at 48 h after hospital admission for SAP, PNec, and IM were 0.82, 0.47, and 0.24, respectively. The optimal CRP at 48 h after hospital admission cutoff points for SAP, PNec, and IM derived were 190, 190, and 170 mg/l, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CRP at 48 h after hospital admission showed a good prognostic accuracy for SAP, PNec, and IM, better than CRP measured at any other timing. The optimal CRP at 48 h after hospital admission cutoff points for SAP, PNec, and IM varied from 170 to 190 mg/l.

摘要

目的

C 反应蛋白(CRP)已广泛应用于急性胰腺炎患者的早期风险评估。本研究旨在评估 CRP 在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度(SAP)、胰腺坏死(PNec)和院内死亡率(IM)方面的预后准确性,探讨 CRP 最佳测量时间和最佳截断值。

材料和方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,共纳入 379 例连续入院的急性胰腺炎患者。收集入院时、入院后 24、48 和 72 小时的 CRP 检测值。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验评估 CRP 对 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的诊断和预测能力。采用最小 P 值法确定预测 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的最佳 CRP 截断值。

结果

共 11%的患者为 SAP,20%发生 PNec,4.2%死亡。入院后 48 小时 CRP 对 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.81(95%CI 0.72-0.90)、0.77(95%CI 0.68-0.87)和 0.79(95%CI 0.67-0.91)。入院后 48 小时 CRP 对 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 P 值分别为 0.82、0.47 和 0.24。入院后 48 小时 CRP 最佳截断值预测 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的切点分别为 190、190 和 170 mg/L。

结论

入院后 48 小时 CRP 对 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的预后准确性较好,优于其他任何时间点的 CRP。入院后 48 小时 CRP 预测 SAP、PNec 和 IM 的最佳截断值为 170-190 mg/L。

相似文献

1
C-reactive protein prognostic accuracy in acute pancreatitis: timing of measurement and cutoff points.C-反应蛋白在急性胰腺炎中的预后准确性:测量时间和截断值。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;25(7):784-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835fd3f0.
2
Nosocomial mortality and early prediction of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.医院获得性死亡率与重症急性胰腺炎患者的早期预测。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;25(8):1386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06376.x.
3
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.比较 BISAP、Ranson's、APACHE-II 和 CTSI 评分在预测急性胰腺炎器官衰竭、并发症和死亡率中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):435-41; quiz 442. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
4
Human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on peripheral monocytes may be an early marker for secondary infection in severe acute pancreatitis.外周血单核细胞上人类白细胞抗原-DR的表达可能是重症急性胰腺炎继发感染的早期标志物。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):1896-902.
5
Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of serum poly-C avid ribonuclease activity and C-reactive protein concentration in detection of mild and severe acute pancreatitis.血清多聚C 亲和核糖核酸酶活性与C反应蛋白浓度在检测轻度和重度急性胰腺炎中的敏感性和特异性比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004 May;42(5):549-55. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.093.
6
C-reactive protein may influence decisively the prescription of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis: a population-based cohort study.C反应蛋白可能对急性胰腺炎预防性抗生素的处方产生决定性影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Pancreas. 2015 Apr;44(3):404-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000279.
7
Serum amyloid A is a better early predictor of severity than C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis.在急性胰腺炎中,血清淀粉样蛋白A比C反应蛋白是更好的严重程度早期预测指标。
Br J Surg. 2002 Feb;89(2):163-71. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01972.x.
8
BISAP, RANSON, lactate and others biomarkers in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis in a European cohort.BISAP、兰森标准、乳酸及其他生物标志物在欧洲队列中对重症急性胰腺炎的预测作用
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;32(9):1649-1656. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13763.
9
Early angiopoietin-2 levels after onset predict the advent of severe pancreatitis, multiple organ failure, and infectious complications in patients with acute pancreatitis.发病后早期血管生成素-2 水平可预测急性胰腺炎患者重症胰腺炎、多器官衰竭和感染性并发症的发生。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
Blood Urea Nitrogen as a Predictor of Severe Acute Pancreatitis Based on the Revised Atlanta Criteria: Timing of Measurement and Cutoff Points.基于修订版亚特兰大标准的血尿素氮对重症急性胰腺炎的预测作用:测量时间和截断值。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2017:9592831. doi: 10.1155/2017/9592831. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and LDH/Albumin Ratio as Biomarkers for Severity and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及乳酸脱氢酶/白蛋白比值作为急性胰腺炎严重程度和死亡率的生物标志物
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 16;36(8):497-507. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2025.24828.
2
Evaluation of scoring systems and hematological parameters in the severity stratification of early-phase acute pancreatitis.早期急性胰腺炎严重程度分层中评分系统和血液学参数的评估
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 21;31(15):105236. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i15.105236.
3
Hydrogel Innovations in Biosensing: A New Frontier for Pancreatitis Diagnostics.
生物传感中的水凝胶创新:胰腺炎诊断的新前沿。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;12(3):254. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12030254.
4
Identifying novel acute pancreatitis sub-phenotypes using total serum calcium trajectories.利用血清总钙轨迹识别新型急性胰腺炎亚表型。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03224-9.
5
Predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis: Current approaches and future directions.预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度:当前方法与未来方向。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 27;19:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.012. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Persistently High Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein Are Good Predictors of Infection in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.持续高降钙素原和 C 反应蛋白是急性坏死性胰腺炎感染的良好预测指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 20;25(2):1273. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021273.
7
Acute peripancreatic fluid collection in acute pancreatitis: Incidence, outcome, and association with inflammatory markers.急性胰腺炎患者胰腺周围液体积聚:发生率、转归及与炎症标志物的关系。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Aug;29(4):225-232. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_443_22.
8
Utility of Ranson score, computed tomography severity index, and CRP criteria in risk stratification on the day of hospital admission in patients with acute pancreatitis: A cross-sectional analysis.入院当天 Ranson 评分、CT 严重指数和 CRP 标准在急性胰腺炎患者危险分层中的作用:一项横断面分析。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Mar;29(3):350-357. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.33332.
9
Intermediate products of purine metabolism in an experimental model of pancreatic necrosis.嘌呤代谢中间产物在胰腺坏死实验模型中的变化。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Dec 16;93(6):e2022298. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i6.13535.
10
Interleukin-6 is better than C-reactive protein for the prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis.白细胞介素-6 优于 C 反应蛋白,可预测急性胰腺炎患者感染性胰腺坏死和死亡率。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Nov 18;12:933221. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.933221. eCollection 2022.