Suppr超能文献

监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)计划和北美癌症登记协会(NAACCR)的数据完整性方法:它们如何影响中央癌症登记处的数据质量?

SEER and NAACCR data completeness methods: how do they impact data quality in Central Cancer Registries?

作者信息

Hwang Lawrence J, Altekruse Sean, Adamo Margaret, Sun Leon

出版信息

J Registry Manag. 2012 Winter;39(4):185-6.

Abstract

There are 2 widely accepted methods for calculating data completeness in central cancer registries: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program's data completeness method and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries' (NAACCR's) data completeness method. In recent years, the pros and cons of these methods have been discussed and debated by CTRs nationwide. The results from a myriad of studies have shown that each method offers its own set of strengths and unique applications. The aims of this paper are to provide an overview of both the SEER and NAACCR data completeness methods and to discuss the need for an alternative data completeness method.

摘要

在中央癌症登记处计算数据完整性有两种广泛接受的方法

监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划的数据完整性方法以及北美中央癌症登记协会(NAACCR)的数据完整性方法。近年来,这些方法的优缺点在全国范围内的癌症登记人员中进行了讨论和辩论。大量研究结果表明,每种方法都有其自身的优势和独特应用。本文的目的是概述SEER和NAACCR的数据完整性方法,并讨论是否需要一种替代的数据完整性方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验