Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1091-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8.
The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.
本研究旨在评估超声(US)计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统对 BI-RADS 3 类(可能良性)肿块的分类准确性。该研究使用的 US 数据库包含 69 个乳腺肿块(21 个恶性和 48 个良性肿块),在盲法回顾性解读中,至少有 5 位放射科医生将其分配至 BI-RADS 3 类。对于计算机辅助分析,基于 BI-RADS 词典实现了多个形态学(形状、方向、边界、病变边界和后方声学特征)和纹理(回声模式)特征,并采用二项逻辑回归模型进行分类。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析进行统计学分析。形态学、纹理和综合特征的曲线下面积(Az)分别为 0.90、0.75 和 0.95。综合特征的性能最佳,明显优于仅使用纹理特征(0.95 比 0.75,p 值=0.0163)。当灵敏度分别为 86%(18/21)、95%(20/21)和 100%(21/21)时,特异性分别为 90%(43/48)、73%(35/48)和 33%(16/48)。总之,该 CAD 系统具有潜力,可用于提高放射科医生对 US 误诊为 BI-RADS 3 类的恶性肿块的诊断准确性。