Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang Province, China.
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07413-z.
The classification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4A (BI-RADS 4A) lesions is mostly based on the personal experience of doctors and lacks specific and clear classification standards. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) provides a new method for BI-RADS categorisation. We analysed the ultrasonic morphological and texture characteristics of BI-RADS 4A benign and malignant lesions using AI, and these ultrasonic characteristics of BI-RADS 4A benign and malignant lesions were compared to examine the value of AI in the differential diagnosis of BI-RADS 4A benign and malignant lesions.
A total of 206 lesions of BI-RADS 4A examined using ultrasonography were analysed retrospectively, including 174 benign lesions and 32 malignant lesions. All of the lesions were contoured manually, and the ultrasonic morphological and texture features of the lesions, such as circularity, height-to-width ratio, margin spicules, margin coarseness, margin indistinctness, margin lobulation, energy, entropy, grey mean, internal calcification and angle between the long axis of the lesion and skin, were calculated using grey level gradient co-occurrence matrix analysis. Differences between benign and malignant lesions of BI-RADS 4A were analysed.
Significant differences in margin lobulation, entropy, internal calcification and ALS were noted between the benign group and malignant group (P = 0.013, 0.045, 0.045, and 0.002, respectively). The malignant group had more margin lobulations and lower entropy compared with the benign group, and the benign group had more internal calcifications and a greater angle between the long axis of the lesion and skin compared with the malignant group. No significant differences in circularity, height-to-width ratio, margin spicules, margin coarseness, margin indistinctness, energy, and grey mean were noted between benign and malignant lesions.
Compared with the naked eye, AI can reveal more subtle differences between benign and malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions. These results remind us carefully observation of the margin and the internal echo is of great significance. With the help of morphological and texture information provided by AI, doctors can make a more accurate judgment on such atypical benign and malignant lesions.
乳腺影像报告和数据系统 4A 类(BI-RADS 4A)病变的分类主要基于医生的个人经验,缺乏具体和明确的分类标准。人工智能(AI)的发展为 BI-RADS 分类提供了一种新方法。我们使用 AI 分析了 BI-RADS 4A 良性和恶性病变的超声形态和纹理特征,并比较了 BI-RADS 4A 良性和恶性病变的这些超声特征,以探讨 AI 在 BI-RADS 4A 良性和恶性病变鉴别诊断中的价值。
回顾性分析了 206 个经超声检查的 BI-RADS 4A 病变,包括 174 个良性病变和 32 个恶性病变。所有病变均手动勾画,使用灰度梯度共生矩阵分析计算病变的超声形态和纹理特征,如圆形度、高宽比、边缘分叶、边缘粗糙、边缘模糊、边缘分叶、能量、熵、灰度均值、内部钙化和病变长轴与皮肤之间的夹角。分析 BI-RADS 4A 良性和恶性病变之间的差异。
良性组和恶性组在边缘分叶、熵、内部钙化和 ALS 方面有显著差异(P=0.013、0.045、0.045 和 0.002)。恶性组的边缘分叶较多,熵值较低,良性组的内部钙化较多,病变长轴与皮肤之间的夹角较大。良性组和恶性组在圆形度、高宽比、边缘刺、边缘粗糙、边缘模糊、能量和灰度均值方面无显著差异。
与肉眼观察相比,AI 可以揭示 BI-RADS 4A 良性和恶性病变之间更细微的差异。这些结果提醒我们仔细观察边缘和内部回声具有重要意义。借助 AI 提供的形态和纹理信息,医生可以对这些不典型的良性和恶性病变做出更准确的判断。