Suppr超能文献

7 特斯拉心脏磁共振评估右心室功能

Assessment of the right ventricle with cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 7 Tesla.

机构信息

Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (BUFF), Max-Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Mar 14;15(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional and morphologic assessment of the right ventricle (RV) is of clinical importance. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1.5T has become gold standard for RV chamber quantification and assessment of even small wall motion abnormalities, but tissue analysis is still hampered by limited spatial resolution. CMR at 7T promises increased resolution, but is technically challenging. We examined the feasibility of cine imaging at 7T to assess the RV.

METHODS

Nine healthy volunteers underwent CMR at 7T using a 16-element TX/RX coil and acoustic cardiac gating. 1.5T served as gold standard. At 1.5T, steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine imaging with voxel size (1.2 x 1.2 x 6) mm3 was used; at 7T, fast gradient echo (FGRE) with voxel size (1.2 x 1.2 x 6) mm3 and (1.3 x 1.3 x 4) mm3 were applied. RV dimensions (RVEDV, RVESV), RV mass (RVM) and RV function (RVEF) were quantified in transverse slices. Overall image quality, image contrast and image homogeneity were assessed in transverse and sagittal views.

RESULTS

All scans provided diagnostic image quality. Overall image quality and image contrast of transverse RV views were rated equally for SSFP at 1.5T and FGRE at 7T with voxel size (1.3 x 1.3 x 4)mm3. FGRE at 7T provided significantly lower image homogeneity compared to SSFP at 1.5T. RVEDV, RVESV, RVEF and RVM did not differ significantly and agreed close between SSFP at 1.5T and FGRE at 7T (p=0.5850; p=0.5462; p=0.2789; p=0.0743). FGRE at 7T with voxel size (1.3 x 1.3 x 4) mm3 tended to overestimate RV volumes compared to SSFP at 1.5T (mean difference of RVEDV 8.2 ± 9.3 ml) and to FGRE at 7T with voxel size (1.2 x 1.2 x 6) mm3 (mean difference of RVEDV 9.3 ± 8.6 ml).

CONCLUSIONS

FGRE cine imaging of the RV at 7T was feasible and provided good image quality. RV dimensions and function were comparable to SSFP at 1.5T as gold standard.

摘要

背景

右心室(RV)的功能和形态评估具有临床重要性。1.5T 的心血管磁共振(CMR)已成为 RV 腔量化和评估即使是小壁运动异常的金标准,但组织分析仍然受到空间分辨率的限制。7T 的 CMR 有望提高分辨率,但技术上具有挑战性。我们检查了使用 16 通道 TX/RX 线圈和声学心脏门控在 7T 进行电影成像以评估 RV 的可行性。

方法

九名健康志愿者在 7T 下使用 16 元素 TX/RX 线圈和声学心脏门控进行 CMR。1.5T 作为金标准。在 1.5T 下,使用体素大小为 (1.2 x 1.2 x 6) mm3 的稳态自由进动(SSFP)电影成像;在 7T 下,使用体素大小为 (1.2 x 1.2 x 6) mm3 和 (1.3 x 1.3 x 4) mm3 的快速梯度回波(FGRE)。在横断切片中定量 RV 尺寸(RVEDV、RVESV)、RV 质量(RVM)和 RV 功能(RVEF)。在横断和矢状视图中评估整体图像质量、图像对比度和图像均匀性。

结果

所有扫描均提供了诊断性图像质量。横向 RV 视图的整体图像质量和图像对比度在 1.5T 的 SSFP 和 7T 的 FGRE(体素大小为 1.3 x 1.3 x 4)时的评分相等。与 1.5T 的 SSFP 相比,7T 的 FGRE 提供的图像均匀性明显较低。SSFP 在 1.5T 和 7T 的 FGRE(p=0.5850;p=0.5462;p=0.2789;p=0.0743)之间的 RVEDV、RVESV、RVEF 和 RVM 差异无统计学意义且一致性良好。与 1.5T 的 SSFP 相比,7T 的 FGRE(体素大小为 1.3 x 1.3 x 4)mm3 倾向于高估 RV 容积(RVEDV 的平均差异为 8.2 ± 9.3 ml)和 7T 的 FGRE(体素大小为 1.2 x 1.2 x 6)mm3(RVEDV 的平均差异为 9.3 ± 8.6 ml)。

结论

7T 的 RV FGRE 电影成像可行,并提供了良好的图像质量。RV 尺寸和功能与作为金标准的 1.5T 的 SSFP 相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ee/3621368/a6abe0766c20/1532-429X-15-23-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验