• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊切除术前及术后6个月胆汁酸、胃泌素和壁细胞的十二指肠-胃反流以及胃酸分泌情况。

Duodenogastric reflux of bile acids, gastrin and parietal cells, and gastric acid secretion before and 6 months after cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Lorusso D, Misciagna G, Mangini V, Messa C, Cavallini A, Caruso M L, Giorgio P, Guerra V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Scientific Institute for Digestive Diseases S. De Bellis, Castellana Grotte Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1990 Jun;159(6):575-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(06)80069-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(06)80069-3
PMID:2349983
Abstract

In order to evaluate the effect of cholecystectomy on the gastric mucosa, the duodenogastric reflux of total and single bile acids, the number of parietal and gastrin cells, and the volume of gastric acid secretion were examined in 15 patients with gallstones and functioning gallbladders before and 6 months after cholecystectomy. The duodenogastric reflux of the total bile acids increased from a mean preoperative value of 1.9 mumol/hour to a mean postoperative value of 21 mumol/hour (p = 0.008). The duodenogastric reflux of all single bile acids increased after cholecystectomy, with a higher increase in glycoconjugated compared with tauroconjugated bile acids. The parietal cells decreased from a mean preoperative value of 82.8 to a mean postoperative value of 68.7 (p = 0.05), whereas there was only a mild increase in the number of gastrin cells; the output of gastric acid remained unchanged. The variation of the gastrin cells before and after cholecystectomy was negatively correlated only with the variation of taurocholic acid (r = -0.50, p = 0.05), while the variation of the parietal cells was mildly correlated with all single bile acids (r = 0.35-0.50, 0.05 less than p less than 0.02). These findings show an increased duodenogastric reflux of bile acids 6 months after cholecystectomy with a mild morphologic alteration of the gastric mucosa.

摘要

为了评估胆囊切除术对胃黏膜的影响,对15例有功能胆囊的胆结石患者在胆囊切除术前及术后6个月进行了总胆汁酸和单个胆汁酸的十二指肠胃反流、壁细胞和胃泌素细胞数量以及胃酸分泌量的检测。总胆汁酸的十二指肠胃反流从术前平均1.9微摩尔/小时增加到术后平均21微摩尔/小时(p = 0.008)。胆囊切除术后所有单个胆汁酸的十二指肠胃反流均增加,与牛磺结合型胆汁酸相比,糖结合型胆汁酸增加幅度更大。壁细胞数量从术前平均82.8减少到术后平均68.7(p = 0.05),而胃泌素细胞数量仅略有增加;胃酸分泌量保持不变。胆囊切除术前、后胃泌素细胞的变化仅与牛磺胆酸的变化呈负相关(r = -0.50,p = 0.05),而壁细胞的变化与所有单个胆汁酸呈轻度相关(r = 0.35 - 0.50,0.05 < p < 0.02)。这些结果表明,胆囊切除术后6个月胆汁酸的十二指肠胃反流增加,同时胃黏膜有轻度形态学改变。

相似文献

1
Duodenogastric reflux of bile acids, gastrin and parietal cells, and gastric acid secretion before and 6 months after cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术前及术后6个月胆汁酸、胃泌素和壁细胞的十二指肠-胃反流以及胃酸分泌情况。
Am J Surg. 1990 Jun;159(6):575-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(06)80069-3.
2
Gallstones, cholecystectomy, and duodenogastric reflux of bile acid.胆结石、胆囊切除术与胆汁酸的十二指肠-胃反流
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Mar;21(2):181-7. doi: 10.3109/00365528609034644.
3
[Effect of cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy on duodenogastric biliary reflux].[胆结石及胆囊切除术对十二指肠-胃胆汁反流的影响]
Rev Med Chil. 1993 Oct;121(10):1118-22.
4
Evaluation of duodenogastric reflux in gallstone disease before and after simple cholecystectomy.
Am J Surg. 1990 Sep;160(3):283-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(06)80024-3.
5
A prospective study on duodenogastric reflux and on histological changes in gastric mucosa after cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后十二指肠-胃反流及胃黏膜组织学变化的前瞻性研究。
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1992;16(4):328-33.
6
Duodenogastric reflux and gastric mucosal cell proliferation after cholecystectomy or Billroth II gastric resection.胆囊切除术后或毕Ⅱ式胃切除术后的十二指肠-胃反流与胃黏膜细胞增殖
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1994;18(11):927-31.
7
Duodenogastric reflux in patients with upper abdominal complaints or gastric ulcer with particular reference to reflux-associated gastritis.有上腹部不适或胃溃疡患者的十二指肠-胃反流,尤其涉及反流相关性胃炎。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1985;115:1-56.
8
Relative contribution of bile and pancreatic juice duodenogastric reflux in gastric ulcer disease and cholelithiasis.胆汁和胰液十二指肠-胃反流在胃溃疡病和胆石症中的相对作用。
Br J Surg. 1987 Aug;74(8):721-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740823.
9
The postcholecystectomy syndrome. A role for duodenogastric reflux.胆囊切除术后综合征。十二指肠-胃反流的作用。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr;22(3):197-201. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199604000-00009.
10
Duodenogastric bile reflux and gastrointestinal motility in pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. Role of cholecystectomy.十二指肠-胃胆汁反流与胃肠动力在功能性消化不良发病机制中的作用。胆囊切除术的影响
Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Aug;40(8):1703-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02212691.

引用本文的文献

1
The Symptomatic Outcomes of Cholecystectomy for Gallstones.胆囊结石胆囊切除术的症状性结局
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 28;12(5):1897. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051897.
2
Endogenous opioids: opposing stress with a cost.内源性阿片类物质:以付出代价来对抗压力。
F1000Prime Rep. 2015 May 12;7:58. doi: 10.12703/P7-58. eCollection 2015.
3
Controversy surrounding 'mini' gastric bypass.迷你胃旁路术引发争议。
Obes Surg. 2014 Feb;24(2):324-33. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1090-0.
4
Gallstones increase the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus.胆囊结石增加 Barrett 食管的患病率。
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;45(2):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0153-4. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
5
The association between cholecystectomy and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: a prospective controlled study.胆囊切除术与胃食管反流症状的关系:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b9eca4.
6
Effect of cholecystectomy on gastric and esophageal bile reflux in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.胆囊切除术对上消化道症状患者胃和食管胆汁反流的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 May;53(5):1186-91. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9989-8. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
7
A new physiologic approach for the surgical treatment of patients with Barrett's esophagus: technical considerations and results in 65 patients.一种治疗巴雷特食管患者的手术新生理方法:技术要点及65例患者的治疗结果
Ann Surg. 1997 Aug;226(2):123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00002.
8
Cholecystectomy and oesophageal pathology: is there a link?胆囊切除术与食管病变:存在关联吗?
Ir J Med Sci. 1993 Jun;162(6):209-12. doi: 10.1007/BF02945196.