Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Woerlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
Toxicol Lett. 2013 Dec 16;223(3):306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
A discussion paper was developed by a panel of experts of the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA) contributing to the on-going debate on the identification, assessment and management of endocrine disruptors with a view to protect wildlife according to the EU substance legislation (plant protection products, biocides, industrial chemicals). Based on a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art regarding regulatory requirements, testing methods, assessment schemes, decision-making criteria and risk management options, we advise an appropriate and consistent implementation of this important subject into existing chemicals legislation in Europe. Our proposal for a balanced risk management of endocrine disruptors essentially advocates transparent regulatory decision making based on a scientifically robust weight of evidence approach and an adequate risk management consistent across different legislations. With respect to the latter, a more explicit consideration of the principle of proportionality of regulatory decision making and socio-economic benefits in the on-going debate is further encouraged.
一份由德国联邦环境署(UBA)专家小组编写的讨论文件,为正在进行的根据欧盟物质立法(植物保护产品、杀生物剂、工业化学品)对内分泌干扰物的识别、评估和管理的辩论做出了贡献,以保护野生动物。基于对监管要求、测试方法、评估计划、决策标准和风险管理选择的最新技术的批判性综合,我们建议在欧洲现有的化学品立法中适当和一致地实施这一重要主题。我们对内分泌干扰物进行平衡风险管理的建议,实质上是倡导基于科学稳健的证据权重方法进行透明的监管决策,并在不同法规之间进行一致的风险管理。关于后者,我们进一步鼓励在正在进行的辩论中更明确地考虑监管决策的相称性原则和社会经济利益。