Azcarate C L
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1975 Feb;160(2-1):100-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197502000-00004.
Clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of drugs in human aggression have been scarce until recent years. The potential antiaggressive action of minor tranquilizers in humans has received little attention in spite of the claimed "taming effect" in some animal studies. A recent report examining the literature regarding the effects of benzodiazepines on animal models of aggressive behavior has pointed out the lack of consistency in such findings. Similar observations have been noted in humans where reduction in aggressive manifestations is contrasted with an increase in hostility in a few studies, as well as with the appearance of "paradoxical" rage reactions. Some variables that could account for such discrepancies have been advanced. They include, among others, dosage, acute vs. chronic drug administration, and possible qualitive differences among this group of agents. Individual variations as to presenting clinical picture, initial levels of anxiety and hostility, and personality types have also been mentioned. Implications of some of these findings for future clinical research are discussed. At present, a study designed to test the efficacy of two benzodiazepines, at dosages higher than those usually recommended, is being carried out in a population of anxious, aggressive-prone individuals with poor impulse control. Thus far, and in agreement with our previous clinical experience, we have not seen "paradoxical" rage and such high dosages have been well tolerated.
直到近年来,旨在评估药物对人类攻击行为疗效的临床试验仍很稀少。尽管在一些动物研究中声称有“驯服作用”,但弱安定药对人类潜在的抗攻击作用却很少受到关注。最近一份审查有关苯二氮䓬类药物对攻击行为动物模型影响的文献报告指出,此类研究结果缺乏一致性。在人类研究中也有类似的观察结果,在一些研究中,攻击表现的减少与敌意增加形成对比,同时还出现了“矛盾性”愤怒反应。已经提出了一些可能解释这种差异的变量。其中包括剂量、急性与慢性给药,以及这组药物之间可能存在的质量差异。还提到了个体在临床表现、焦虑和敌意初始水平以及人格类型方面的差异。讨论了其中一些发现对未来临床研究的启示。目前,一项旨在测试两种苯二氮䓬类药物疗效的研究正在一群焦虑、有攻击倾向且冲动控制能力差的个体中进行,药物剂量高于通常推荐的剂量。到目前为止,与我们之前的临床经验一致,我们尚未看到“矛盾性”愤怒,而且如此高的剂量耐受性良好。