Deichmann Ute
Jacques Loeb Centre for the History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84105 Beer Sheva, Israel.
Perspect Biol Med. 2012;55(4):521-42. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2012.0046.
Crystals, colloids, and (macro-)molecules have played major roles in theoretical concepts and experimental approaches concerning the generation of life from the mid-19th century on. The notion of the crystallization of life out of a nonliving fluid, a special case of the doctrine of spontaneous generation, was most prominently incorporated into Schleiden's and Schwann's version of cell theory. Refutation at the end of the 19th century of spontaneous generation of life and cells, in particular by Pasteur, Remak, and Virchow, not only gave rise to the flourishing fields of microbiology and cytology, but it also opened up research on synthetic life. These approaches focused on growth and form and colloidal chemistry on the one hand, and on the specificity of organisms' macromolecules and chemical reactions on the other. This article analyzes the contribution of these approaches to synthetic life research and argues that researchers' philosophical predilections and basic beliefs have played important roles in the choice of experimental and theoretical approaches towards synthetic life.
从19世纪中叶起,晶体、胶体和(宏观)分子在有关生命起源的理论概念和实验方法中发挥了重要作用。生命从无生命流体中结晶的概念,作为自然发生学说的一个特例,最显著地被纳入施莱登和施旺的细胞学说版本中。19世纪末对生命和细胞自然发生的驳斥,尤其是巴斯德、雷马克和魏尔肖的驳斥,不仅催生了微生物学和细胞学的蓬勃发展,还开启了合成生命的研究。这些方法一方面侧重于生长、形态和胶体化学,另一方面侧重于生物体大分子的特异性和化学反应。本文分析了这些方法对合成生命研究的贡献,并认为研究人员的哲学偏好和基本信念在合成生命的实验和理论方法选择中发挥了重要作用。